Population-Based Disease Management in the German Statutory Health Insurance: Implementation and Preliminary Results
Abstract
Social healthcare systems in Europe must cope with aging populations and rising costs. For the German social healthcare system, which dates back to the 19th century, this problem is especially apparent, as soaring structural unemployment and the demographic transition of the population threaten the financial basis of the Statutory Health Insurance (SHI) [Gesetzliche Krankenversicherung]. In order to preserve free access to high-quality care and mandatory insurance for most of the population with affordable contributions, the traditional methods of healthcare delivery are challenged. As a result of its historic development, the system is tailored to acute care. Infectious diseases and accidents, however, have lost their relevance as main sources of mortality and morbidity of the population. Chronic diseases that can be influenced in their course by patient self-management and preventive measures dominate as causes of morbidity, mortality, and rising costs of healthcare. Since cost-containment measures can no longer stabilize cost development, structural reforms are strongly advocated. The implementation of a legal framework for disease management programs is the first of several structural reform measures implemented in the SHI. Diseases for which a legal framework has been approved include type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, breast cancer, and asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Quality requirements for the programs are high and include a central-accreditation process, evaluation in 3-year intervals by independent investigators, and specific quality management measures outlined for each disease. Major features of the programs include a population-based, patient-centric, and physician-based design. Since 2002, >1.6 million patients were enrolled in diabetes programs nationwide. Preliminary results point to positive effects of the programs on outcomes and process parameters, such as blood glucose and blood pressure readings or performed yearly eye examinations for patients with diabetes. Differences in the German and the US approach to disease management not only include a top-down versus a bottom-up approach; the German approach aims at secondary prevention regardless of risk state, co-morbidities, and possible cost savings, whereas in the US high-risk approaches are common. For the US, the German physician-based approach to disease management could be of interest in the evolving Medicare programs whereas German programs could become more effective drawing on US pay-for-quality experiences. Disease management, whether vendor or physician based, may not be the ultimate solution to all problems in the care of chronically ill patients, but it may facilitate change from a system traditionally focused on acute care to one focused on chronic care.Download Info
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic Info
Article provided by Wolters Kluwer Health | Adis in its journal Disease Management & Health Outcomes.
Volume (Year): 14 (2006)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Pages: 5-12
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:wkh:dmhout:v:14:y:2006:i:1:p:5-12
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://diseasemanagement.adisonline.com/
For corrections or technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Dave Dustin).
Related research
Keywords: Disease-management-programmes; Health-insurance;Find related papers by JEL classification:
- C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods
- D - Microeconomics
- I - Health, Education, and Welfare
- Z - Other Special Topics
- I1 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health
- I19 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Other
- I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
- I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets
References
No references listed on IDEASYou can help add them by filling out this form.
Citations
Lists
This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wkh:dmhout:v:14:y:2006:i:1:p:5-12For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dave Dustin).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.