Improved Diabetes Control Through a Provider-Based Disease Management Program
Abstract
Objective: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a newly implemented hospital-based diabetes mellitus disease management program. A secondary aim was to determine if relationships existed among variables. Design and setting: Effectiveness was evaluated in terms of glycemic control, post-program acute care resource utilization, adherence with American Diabetes Association (ADA) standards of care, and health-related quality of life. Participants in the Diabetes LifeCare program (DLC) received all standards of care which included diabetes self-management education, medical management by a primary care provider (PCP) supported by an evaluation and recommendations by an Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN), nutritional counseling and at minimum, quarterly follow-up appointments for 1 year. Patients: Patients who were aged >=18 years and referred to the DLC program with new a diagnosis or history of type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus. Main outcome measures and results: Results demonstrated that at 3 months after enrollment in the DLC, participants in the study with available data (n = 142) had a mean decrease in predominant glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) values from 9.31 to 7.21 (p < 0.001). The HbA1c value for participants with data at the 6-month visit (n = 66) decreased from 9.23 to 7.22 at 3 months and to 6.80 at 6 months (p < 0.001). At baseline, 52 of the 142 participants (36.5%) had HbA1c values less than 8.0, compared with 107 patients (75.4%) at 3 months (p < 0.0001). A total of 185 of 227 patients (81.5%) received eye examinations as per ADA guidelines. A total of 225 of 227 patients (99.1%) were in compliance with the ADA guidelines for nutritional counseling as a result of participation in the program. On the Physical Component Summary, their mean scores were 42.75 [standard deviation (SD) = 11.17] at enrollment, compared with 45.12 (SD = 10.52) at 3 months (p < 0.001). The Mental Component Summary score increased from 47.52 (SD = 11.90) to 50.83 (SD = 10.47) [p < 0.001]. Regarding resource utilization, during the follow-up period only 3 of 227 patients had emergency room visits and there were no inpatient visits for acute problems related to diabetes. Conclusions: Our results show that, in the short term, significant improvement in glycemic control can be achieved through a comprehensive program of patient education and management, that includes collaborative efforts with the patient's primary care provider. High rates of eye and foot examination can also be attained by reinforcing patient involvement and admissions for acute metabolic complications can be minimized.Download Info
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic Info
Article provided by Wolters Kluwer Health | Adis in its journal Disease Management & Health Outcomes.
Volume (Year): 10 (2002)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Pages: 1-8
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:wkh:dmhout:v:10:y:2002:i:1:p:1-8
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://diseasemanagement.adisonline.com/
For corrections or technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Dave Dustin).
Related research
Keywords: Antihyperglycaemics; Diabetes mellitus; Pharmacoeconomics; Quality of life;Find related papers by JEL classification:
- C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods
- D - Microeconomics
- I - Health, Education, and Welfare
- Z - Other Special Topics
- I1 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health
- I19 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Other
- I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
- I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets
References
No references listed on IDEASYou can help add them by filling out this form.
Citations
Lists
This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wkh:dmhout:v:10:y:2002:i:1:p:1-8For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dave Dustin).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.