Advanced Search

Aversion to Geographic Inequality and Geographic Variation in Preferences in the Context of Healthcare

Contents:

Author Info

  • Carlota Quintal

    (Faculty of Economics, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal Centre for Health Studies and Research, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    Background: It is now widely accepted that social values have a role to play in terms of healthcare resource allocation decisions. Furthermore, with the recent focus on decentralization, geographic variation in preferences has become a pertinent issue. However, the geographic dimension of inequality in the distribution of health gains across different regions has received little attention in the literature. Objectives: To elicit the general public's preferences regarding inequality in the distribution of health gains across regions and to test the assumption of variation in preferences across regions. Methods: A questionnaire was developed to elicit social and personal preferences. The first preference questions focused on the criteria of maximization of health gain and geographic equality of health gain. Person trade-off questions were used to assess trade-offs and inequality aversion. The latter preference questions focused on attributes of healthcare delivery. The questionnaire was administered in two Portuguese municipalities. Samples from both localities were defined by quotas based on the composition of local populations. Overall, 70 respondents (half from each municipality) self-completed the questionnaire. Results: Respondents agreed or strongly agreed that both maximization of health gain and geographic equality of health gain should be considered in resource allocation decisions; when they were asked to make trade-offs, 70-80% were prepared to do so. Of those making trade-offs, most people were willing to forego 10-30% of total health gain to keep geographic equality of health gain in return. Regarding inequality aversion, the results indicate that there was some aversion to inequality in the sample. Regarding preference variation, the results do not corroborate the hypothesis of variation in preferences across regions. Conclusion: These results suggest that the general public supports the principles of maximization of health gain and geographic equality in the distribution of health gain. The results further suggest the existence of aversion to inequality, subject to a maximum opportunity cost. Further research is required into preference variation; in particular, in larger samples, and in other regions of Portugal.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://healtheconomics.adisonline.com/pt/re/ahe/pdfhandler.00148365-200907020-00004.pdf
    Download Restriction: Pay per view
    File URL: http://healtheconomics.adisonline.com/pt/re/ahe/fulltext.00148365-200907020-00004.htm
    Download Restriction: Pay per view

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by Springer Healthcare | Adis in its journal Applied Health Economics & Health Policy.

    Volume (Year): 7 (2009)
    Issue (Month): 2 ()
    Pages: 121-136
    Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
    Handle: RePEc:wkh:aheahp:v:7:y:2009:i:2:p:121-136

    Contact details of provider:
    Web page: http://healtheconomics.adisonline.com/

    For corrections or technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Dave Dustin).

    Related research

    Keywords:

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wkh:aheahp:v:7:y:2009:i:2:p:121-136

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dave Dustin).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.