IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wfo/monber/y2017i10p797-805.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wachstums- und Beschäftigungseffekte des Programmes der Ländlichen Entwicklung 2007-2013

Author

Listed:
  • Franz Sinabell
  • Gerhard Streicher
  • Mathias Kirchner

    (WIFO)

Abstract

Im österreichischen Programm der Ländlichen Entwicklung 2007-2013 wurden ab 2007 pro Jahr 1,1 Mrd. € an Fördermitteln eingesetzt, um Wertschöpfung, Beschäftigung, Umwelt- und Lebensqualität zu steigern. Diese Mittel wurden zu 52% von der EU finanziert und durch Beiträge von Bund und Ländern ergänzt. Zu den Begünstigten zählen vor allem die Landwirtschaft und die Forstwirtschaft. Darüber hinaus wurden Unternehmen und Gewerbebetriebe in der biobasierten Wertschöpfungskette und regionale Initiativen der ländlichen Bevölkerung gefördert. Modellanalysen zeigen vielfältige Wirkungen des Programmes auf die Volkswirtschaft. Die durch die Förderungen ausgelöste Wertschöpfung betrug 1,6 Mrd. €. Damit waren 30.300 Beschäftigungsverhältnisse verbunden. Die Zuwächse waren nicht auf ländliche Gebiete beschränkt, sondern stärkten Wachstum und Beschäftigung in den urbanen Regionen ebenfalls signifikant. Ohne das Programm wären Stickstoffüberschüsse und Emissionen von Treibhausgasen aus der Landwirtschaft um 16% bzw. 3% höher gewesen. Durch das Programm wurde verhindert, dass 11% der landwirtschaftlich genutzten Fläche aus der Produktion genommen worden wären.

Suggested Citation

  • Franz Sinabell & Gerhard Streicher & Mathias Kirchner, 2017. "Wachstums- und Beschäftigungseffekte des Programmes der Ländlichen Entwicklung 2007-2013," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 90(10), pages 797-805, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wfo:monber:y:2017:i:10:p:797-805
    Note: With English abstract.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.wifo.ac.at/wwa/pubid/60710
    File Function: abstract
    Download Restriction: Payment required
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oliver Fritz & Robert Hierländer & Gerhard Streicher & Reinhard Haller & Anna Mayerthaler & Günter Emberger, 2010. "ETMOS – An Integrated Economic Transport Modelling System for Austria," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 40395, February.
    2. Oliver Fritz & Ina Matt & Klaus Nowotny & Gerhard Streicher, 2008. "Die wirtschaftliche Bedeutung der Telekom Austria AG – "Bereich Festnetz"," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 31742, February.
    3. Oliver Fritz & Dieter Pennerstorfer & Gerhard Streicher, 2012. "IKT-Infrastruktur: Potential, Nutzung und Wirtschaftsentwicklung," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 44134, February.
    4. Kirchner, Mathias & Schmidt, Johannes & Kindermann, Georg & Kulmer, Veronika & Mitter, Hermine & Prettenthaler, Franz & Rüdisser, Johannes & Schauppenlehner, Thomas & Schönhart, Martin & Strauss, Fran, 2015. "Ecosystem services and economic development in Austrian agricultural landscapes — The impact of policy and climate change scenarios on trade-offs and synergies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 161-174.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Franz Sinabell & Gerhard Streicher, 2020. "Die Wertschöpfungskette von Agrargütern und Lebensmitteln in Österreich," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 66355, February.
    2. Franz Sinabell & Dieter Pennerstorfer & Stephanie Lackner, 2016. "Eine volkswirtschaftliche Analyse der Wildbach- und Lawinenverbauung in Österreich. Die Bereitstellung von Schutzgütern bisher und der künftige Bedarf," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58854, February.
    3. Franz Sinabell & Mark Sommer & Mathias Kirchner, 2018. "Volkswirtschaftliche Analyse der Hochwasserschutzinvestitionen des BMVIT. Aktualisierung," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 61116, February.
    4. Danilo Bertoni & Daniele Cavicchioli & Franco Donzelli & Giovanni Ferrazzi & Dario G. Frisio & Roberto Pretolani & Elena Claire Ricci & Vera Ventura, 2018. "Recent Contributions of Agricultural Economics Research in the Field of Sustainable Development," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Mitter, Hermine & Schmid, Erwin, 2019. "Computing the economic value of climate information for water stress management exemplified by crop production in Austria," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 430-448.
    6. Christian Albert & Johannes Hermes & Felix Neuendorf & Christina Von Haaren & Michael Rode, 2016. "Assessing and Governing Ecosystem Services Trade-Offs in Agrarian Landscapes: The Case of Biogas," Land, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-17, January.
    7. Hanaček, Ksenija & Langemeyer, Johannes & Bileva, Tatyana & Rodríguez-Labajos, Beatriz, 2021. "Understanding environmental conflicts through cultural ecosystem services - the case of agroecosystems in Bulgaria," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    8. Schirpke, Uta & Kohler, Marina & Leitinger, Georg & Fontana, Veronika & Tasser, Erich & Tappeiner, Ulrike, 2017. "Future impacts of changing land-use and climate on ecosystem services of mountain grassland and their resilience," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(PA), pages 79-94.
    9. Yi Shang & Dongyan Wang & Shuhan Liu & Hong Li, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Variation and Mechanisms Causing Spatial Differentiation of Ecosystem Services in Ecologically Fragile Regions Based on Value Evaluation: A Case Study of Western Jilin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, April.
    10. Zhao, Mingyue & Peng, Jian & Liu, Yuanxin & Li, Tianyi & Wang, Yanglin, 2018. "Mapping Watershed-Level Ecosystem Service Bundles in the Pearl River Delta, China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 106-117.
    11. Picchi, Paolo & van Lierop, Martina & Geneletti, Davide & Stremke, Sven, 2019. "Advancing the relationship between renewable energy and ecosystem services for landscape planning and design: A literature review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 241-259.
    12. Yiting Chen & Zhanbin Li & Peng Li & Zipei Zhang & Yixin Zhang, 2021. "Identification of Coupling and Influencing Factors between Urbanization and Ecosystem Services in Guanzhong, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-21, September.
    13. He, Juan & Shi, Xueyi & Fu, Yangjun & Yuan, Ye, 2020. "Evaluation and simulation of the impact of land use change on ecosystem services trade-offs in ecological restoration areas, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    14. Nicoleta Mihaela Doran & Roxana Maria Bădîrcea & Marius Dalian Doran, 2022. "Financing the Agri-Environmental Policy: Consequences on the Economic Growth and Environmental Quality in Romania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-15, October.
    15. Rodríguez, Tatiana & Reu, Björn & Bolívar-Santamaría, Sergio & Cortés-Aguilar, Alexandra & Buendía, Corina, 2023. "A framework for participatory scenario planning to guide transitions towards sustainability in mountain social-ecological systems: A case study from the Colombian Andes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    16. Schönhart, Martin & Trautvetter, Helene & Parajka, Juraj & Blaschke, Alfred Paul & Hepp, Gerold & Kirchner, Mathias & Mitter, Hermine & Schmid, Erwin & Strenn, Birgit & Zessner, Matthias, 2018. "Modelled impacts of policies and climate change on land use and water quality in Austria," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 500-514.
    17. Kolosz, B.W. & Athanasiadis, I.N. & Cadisch, G. & Dawson, T.P. & Giupponi, C. & Honzák, M. & Martinez-Lopez, J. & Marvuglia, A. & Mojtahed, V. & Ogutu, K.B.Z. & Van Delden, H. & Villa, F. & Balbi, S., 2018. "Conceptual advancement of socio-ecological modelling of ecosystem services for re-evaluating Brownfield land," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 33(PA), pages 29-39.
    18. Michael Peneder & Julia Bock-Schappelwein & Matthias Firgo & Oliver Fritz & Gerhard Streicher, 2017. "Ökonomische Effekte der Digitalisierung in Österreich," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 90(3), pages 177-192, March.
    19. Torabi, Nooshin & Bekessy, Sarah A., 2015. "Bundling and stacking in bio-sequestration schemes: Opportunities and risks identified by Australian stakeholders," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 15(C), pages 84-92.
    20. Reidsma, Pytrik & Bakker, Martha M. & Kanellopoulos, Argyris & Alam, Shah J. & Paas, Wim & Kros, Johannes & de Vries, Wim, 2015. "Sustainable agricultural development in a rural area in the Netherlands? Assessing impacts of climate and socio-economic change at farm and landscape level," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 160-173.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wfo:monber:y:2017:i:10:p:797-805. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Florian Mayr (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wifooat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.