IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wfo/monber/y2001i10p613-621.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Schadenversicherung dämpft 2000 Ertragslage der Versicherungswirtschaft

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Url

    (WIFO)

Abstract

Die private Versicherungswirtschaft verzeichnete im Jahr 2000 ein vergleichsweise hohes Prämienwachstum. Die Lebensversicherung bildet mit zweistelligen Steigerungsraten nach wie vor den Wachstumsmotor, doch auch die Kranken- und die Schaden-Unfallversicherung verzeichneten dank Preissteigerungen wieder höhere Prämieneinnahmen. Sturm-, Hagel- und Feuerschäden hatten in der Sachversicherung eine überaus starke Zunahme der Leistungen und in der Folge eine Halbierung des versicherungstechnischen Ergebnisses zur Folge. Die Rendite versicherungstechnischer Kapitalanlagen konnte trotz der ungünstigen Rahmenbedingungen auf den internationalen Aktienmärkten auf hohem Niveau gehalten werden.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Url, 2001. "Schadenversicherung dämpft 2000 Ertragslage der Versicherungswirtschaft," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 74(10), pages 613-621, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wfo:monber:y:2001:i:10:p:613-621
    Note: With English abstract.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.wifo.ac.at/wwa/pubid/20609
    File Function: abstract
    Download Restriction: Payment required
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bhattacharya Sudipto & Thakor Anjan V., 1993. "Contemporary Banking Theory," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 3(1), pages 2-50, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Ting-Hsuan & Shen, Chung-Hua & Wu, Meng-Wen & Huang, Kuo-Jui, 2021. "Effect of shadow banking on the relation between capital and liquidity creation," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 166-184.
    2. Michiel Bijlsma & Wouter Elsenburg & Michiel van Leuvensteijn, 2010. "Four Futures for Finance; A scenario study," CPB Document 211.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    3. Lakshmi Balasubramanyan, 2011. "The Impact of Concurrent Capital and Liquidity Requirements," NFI Working Papers 2011-WP-25, Indiana State University, Scott College of Business, Networks Financial Institute.
    4. Simon Cornée, 2014. "Soft Information and Default Prediction in Cooperative and Social Banks," Journal of Entrepreneurial and Organizational Diversity, European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises, vol. 3(1), pages 89-103, June.
    5. Agnès Labye & Christine Lagoutte & Françoise Renversez, 2002. "Banques mutualistes et systèmes financiers : une analyse comparative Allemagne, Grande-Bretagne, France," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 67(3), pages 85-109.
    6. Apanard P. Prabha & Clas Wihlborg & Thomas D. Willett, 2012. "Market Discipline for Financial Institutions and Markets for Information," Chapters, in: James R. Barth & Chen Lin & Clas Wihlborg (ed.), Research Handbook on International Banking and Governance, chapter 13, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Iosifidi, Maria & Kokas, Sotirios, 2015. "Who lends to riskier and lower-profitability firms? Evidence from the syndicated loan market," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(S1), pages 14-21.
    8. Joohyung Ha, 2021. "Bank accounting conservatism and bank loan quality," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(3-4), pages 498-532, March.
    9. Ginés Hernández-Cánovas & Pedro Martínez-Solano, 2007. "Effect of the Number of Banking Relationships on Credit Availability: Evidence from Panel Data of Spanish Small Firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 37-53, January.
    10. Nik Hadiyan Binti Nik Azman, 2023. "Game analysis between startup and banks," GATR Journals gjbssr631, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    11. Panagiotis Staikouras & Christos Staikouras & Maria-Eleni Agoraki, 2007. "The effect of board size and composition on European bank performance," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 1-27, February.
    12. Ehrmann, M. & Worms, A., 2001. "Interbank Lending and Monetary Policy Transmission: Evidence for Germany," Papers 73, Quebec a Montreal - Recherche en gestion.
    13. Jean-Charles Rochet, 2003. "Réglementation prudentielle et discipline de marché," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 73(4), pages 201-212.
    14. Decamps, Jean-Paul & Rochet, Jean-Charles & Roger, Benoit, 2004. "The three pillars of Basel II: optimizing the mix," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 132-155, April.
    15. Olivier Accominotti & Delio Lucena‐Piquero & Stefano Ugolini, 2021. "The origination and distribution of money market instruments: sterling bills of exchange during the first globalization," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 74(4), pages 892-921, November.
    16. Georges Dionne, 2003. "The Foundationsof Banks' Risk Regulation: A Review of Literature," THEMA Working Papers 2003-46, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
    17. Carlstrom, Charles T. & Samolyk, Katherine A., 1995. "Loan sales as a response to market-based capital constraints," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 19(3-4), pages 627-646, June.
    18. Yeddou, Nacera & Pourroy, Marc, 2020. "Bank liquidity creation: Does ownership structure matter?," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 116-131.
    19. Oliver Entrop & Marco Wilkens & Alexander Zeisler, 2009. "Quantifying the Interest Rate Risk of Banks: Assumptions Do Matter," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 15(5), pages 1001-1018, November.
    20. Jos van Bommel & Jose Penalva, 2012. "The Governance of Perpetual Financial Intermediaries," DEM Discussion Paper Series 12-10, Department of Economics at the University of Luxembourg.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wfo:monber:y:2001:i:10:p:613-621. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Florian Mayr (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wifooat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.