The Extent of Information: Its Relevance for Random Utility Models
AbstractThis paper examines the effect of the researcher's definition of a recreator's choice set on the parameter and welfare estimates from standard random utility models. Three choice set definitions are compared: choice sets based on all alternatives within the survey, those alternatives within a specified distance from the respondents home, and alternatives familiar to the individual. We show that parameter and welfare estimates are sensitive to the definition of the choice set. Welfare measures of site closures differ in varying ways depending on the familiarity level of the sites in question.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by University of Wisconsin Press in its journal Land Economics.
Volume (Year): 76 (2000)
Issue (Month): 3 ()
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://le.uwpress.org/
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- Q26 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Recreational Aspects of Natural Resources
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Timothy C. Haab & Robert L. Hicks, .
"Accounting for Choice Set Endogeneity in Random Utility Models of Recreation Demand,"
9710, East Carolina University, Department of Economics.
- Haab, Timothy C. & Hicks, Robert L., 1997. "Accounting for Choice Set Endogeneity in Random Utility Models of Recreation Demand," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 127-147, October.
- Timothy C. Haab & Robert L. Hicks, . "Accounting for Choice Set Endogeneity in Random Utility Models of Recreation Demand," Working Papers 9608, East Carolina University, Department of Economics.
- McConnell, Kenneth E. & Tseng, Wei-Chun, 1999. "Some Preliminary Evidence On Sampling Of Alternatives With The Random Parameters Logit," Marine Resource Economics, Marine Resources Foundation, vol. 14(4).
- Mario Du Preez & Deborah Ellen Lee & Stephen Gerald Hosking, 2011. "The recreational value of beaches in the Nelson Mandela Bay area, South Africa," Working Papers 239, Economic Research Southern Africa.
- Hicks, Robert L. & Schnier, Kurt E., 2010. "Spatial regulations and endogenous consideration sets in fisheries," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 117-134, April.
- Parsons, George R. & Massey, D. Matthew & Tomasi, Theodore D., 1999. "Familiar And Favorite Sites In A Random Utility Model Of Beach Recreation," Marine Resource Economics, Marine Resources Foundation, vol. 14(4).
- Hicks, Robert L. & Kirkley, James E. & Strand, Ivar E., Jr., 2004. "Short-Run Welfare Losses From Essential Fish Habitat Designations For The Surfclam And Ocean Quahog Fisheries," Marine Resource Economics, Marine Resources Foundation, vol. 19(1).
- MacPherson, Alexander J. & Moore, Rebecca & Provencher, Bill, 2006. "A Dynamic Principal-Agent Model of Human-Mediated Aquatic Species Invasions," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 35(1), April.
- Moore, Rebecca & Macpherson, Alex & Provencher, Bill, 2005. "A Dynamic Principal-Agent Model of Human-Mediated Aquatic Species Invasions," Staff Paper Series 485, University of Wisconsin, Agricultural and Applied Economics.
- Jordan Louviere & Kenneth Train & Moshe Ben-Akiva & Chandra Bhat & David Brownstone & Trudy Cameron & Richard Carson & J. Deshazo & Denzil Fiebig & William Greene & David Hensher & Donald Waldman, 2005. "Recent Progress on Endogeneity in Choice Modeling," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 255-265, December.
- Christopher Avery & Caroline Minter Hoxby, 2004.
"Do and Should Financial Aid Packages Affect Students' College Choices?,"
in: College Choices: The Economics of Where to Go, When to Go, and How to Pay For It, pages 239-302
National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Christopher Avery & Caroline M. Hoxby, 2003. "Do and Should Financial Aid Packages Affect Students' College Choices?," NBER Working Papers 9482, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Scrogin, David & Hofler, Richard & Boyle, Kevin J. & Milon, J. Walter, 2004. "On The Frontier Of Generating Revealed Preference Choice Sets: An Efficient Approach," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20134, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
- Phaneuf, Daniel J. & Smith, V. Kerry, 2006. "Recreation Demand Models," Handbook of Environmental Economics, in: K. G. Mäler & J. R. Vincent (ed.), Handbook of Environmental Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 15, pages 671-761 Elsevier.
- J. DeShazo & Trudy Cameron & Manrique Saenz, 2009. "The Effect of Consumers’ Real-World Choice Sets on Inferences from Stated Preference Surveys," Environmental & Resource Economics, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 42(3), pages 319-343, March.
- John C. Whitehead & Timothy C. Haab, 1999. "SE MRFSS: Distance and Catch Based Choice Sets," Working Papers 9912, East Carolina University, Department of Economics.
- Cropper, Maureen L. & Isaac, William, 2011. "The Benefits of Achieving the Chesapeake Bay TMDLs (Total Maximum Daily Loads): A Scoping Study," Discussion Papers dp-11-31, Resources For the Future.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ().
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.