IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/uwp/jhriss/v8y1973i4p456-471.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Racial Wage Discrimination and Employment Segregation

Author

Listed:
  • Robert J. Flanagan

Abstract

This paper develops empirical tests of the utility analysis approach to wage discrimination within a given occupation. In one section, the general equilibrium prediction of negatively sloped relative racial demand curves is tested using cross-section regressions. In another section, actual employment segregation of whites and blacks is compared with the extent of segregation that would be expected on a purely random basis and the extent of segregation predicted by the stringent version of the utility analysis model. The evidence indicates that the employment segregation prediction of the utility analysis model is doubtful, but clarifies the influence of ethnic groups and economic development on racial wage differentials.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert J. Flanagan, 1973. "Racial Wage Discrimination and Employment Segregation," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 8(4), pages 456-471.
    • Handle: RePEc:uwp:jhriss:v:8:y:1973:i:4:p:456-471
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/144856
    Download Restriction: A subscripton is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:eee:labchp:v:1:y:1986:i:c:p:693-785 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. ITA G. G. KREFT & JAN de LEEUW, 1994. "The Gender Gap in Earnings," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 22(3), pages 319-341, February.
    3. Marcus Alexis & Marshall Medoff, 1984. "Becker’s utility approach to discrimination: A review of the issues," The Review of Black Political Economy, Springer;National Economic Association, vol. 12(4), pages 41-58, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uwp:jhriss:v:8:y:1973:i:4:p:456-471. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://jhr.uwpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.