Evaluating Pooled Evidence from the Reemployment Bonus Experiments
AbstractSocial experiments conducted in Pennsylvania and Washington tested the effect of offering Unemployment Insurance (UI) claimants a cash bonus for rapid reemployment. This paper combines data from the two experiments and uses a consistent framework to evaluate the experiments and determine with greater certainty the extent to which a reemployment bonus can affect economic outcomes. Bonus offers in each of the experiments generated statistically significant but relatively modest reductions in UI receipt. Since the estimated impacts on UI receipt were modest, the reemployment bonuses did not generate the UI savings necessary to pay for administering and paying the bonuses. Hence, contrary to earlier findings from a bonus experiment conducted in Illinois, findings from the Pennsylvania and Washington experiments strongly suggest that a reemployment bonus is not a cost-effective method of speeding the reemployment of UI claimants.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by University of Wisconsin Press in its journal Journal of Human Resources.
Volume (Year): 30 (1995)
Issue (Month): 3 ()
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://jhr.uwpress.org/
Other versions of this item:
- Paul Decker & Christopher O'Leary, 1995. "Evaluating Pooled Evidence from the Reemployment Bonus Experiments," Mathematica Policy Research Reports, Mathematica Policy Research 1978, Mathematica Policy Research.
- Paul T. Decker & Christopher J. O'Leary, 1994. "Evaluating Pooled Evidence from the Reemployment Bonus Experiments," Upjohn Working Papers and Journal Articles, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research 94-28, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
- Paul T. Decker & Christopher J. O'Leary, . "Evaluating Pooled Evidence from the Reemployment Bonus Experiments," Upjohn Working Papers and Journal Articles, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research ptdcjo1995, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
- J0 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General
- J6 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers
- H5 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Moffitt, Robert, 1985. "Unemployment insurance and the distribution of unemployment spells," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 85-101, April.
- Meyer, Bruce D, 1990.
"Unemployment Insurance and Unemployment Spells,"
Econometrica, Econometric Society,
Econometric Society, vol. 58(4), pages 757-82, July.
- Paul T. Decker & Christopher J. O'Leary., 1991. "An Analysis of Pooled Evidence From the Pennsylvania and Washington Reemployment Bonus Demonstrations," Mathematica Policy Research Reports, Mathematica Policy Research 1134, Mathematica Policy Research.
This item has more than 25 citations. To prevent cluttering this page, these citations are listed on a separate page. reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ().
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.