This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Short-term versus long-term military planning

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Ronen Bar-El (The Open University of Israel)
Kobi Kagan (Department of Economics, Bar-Ilan University, Israel)
Asher Tishler. () (Faculty of Management, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel)
Abstract

This article analyzes the allocation of the government budget to civilian and military expenditure by two rival countries that are involved in an arms race. We compare the consequences of myopic (period by period) planning versus rational (long-term) planning and show that although myopic planning is always favorable for both countries, they are likely to become locked in a prisoners’ dilemma equilibrium in which they plan rationally. The prisoners’ dilemma equilibrium results in higher stocks of weapon systems and lower welfare for both countries. We also find some evidence of the existence of a prisoners’ dilemma equilibrium in the current Israeli-Syrian arms race. Generally, this article suggests that solving military/political conflicts that evolve into an arms race by relying only on military might is an expensive and suboptimal solution. Each country should identify this phenomenon and attempt to take it into account in its decisionmaking by using appropriate policy alternatives. There are two major policy options in this case. The first option is to reach some kind of agreement with the rival (directly or through a third party). The second option is to institute force multipliers techniques.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.epsjournal.org.uk/Vol4/No1/issue.php
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: Access to full text for Volume 2 onwards is restricted to subscribers

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Publisher Info
Article provided by Economists for Peace and Security (UK) in its journal Economics of Peace and Security Journal.

Volume (Year): 4 (2009)
Issue (Month): 1 (January)
Pages: 84-90
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:uwe:journl:v:4:y:2009:i:1:p:84-90

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.epsjournal.org.uk
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (J Paul Dunne).

Related research
Keywords: arms race; intertemporal defense budget allocation; prisoners’ dilemma.;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
D74 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Conflict; Conflict Resolution; Alliances
D78 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Positive Analysis of Policy-Making and Implementation
D90 - Microeconomics - - Intertemporal Choice and Growth - - - General
H56 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - National Security and War
H68 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Forecasts of Budgets, Deficits, and Debt

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? You too can volunteer for RePEc, for example by encouraging others to use our services.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-19.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.