IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/uje/journl/y2014i6p29-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Foresight Programming And The Improving Of Decision-Making Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Volodymyr Shedyakov

Abstract

The article is shaping attitudes towards opportunities and ways to optimize the using of foresight programming approaches and techniques. In particular, in the article the nature, range and technology of foresight programming in (post) modern business environment are examined. Thus the prospects of foresight development are considered in conjunction with measures of socio-economic recovery for the development of regional and municipal level clusters. In this context promising trends transforming organizational culture and management relations are analysed. Conclusions about effective ways of modernizing infrastructure based technology of foresight programming are formed. From this perspective, the macro- and macrolevels the prerequisites of the productive system to take advantage of the device open society are investigated. Global spread of trends and logics of development is analysed as the prerequisites and conditions of kognitariat's society, the information age, models of postmodern, reflections of postnonclassical science, sixth technological structure and the knowledge economy. Distinguishing and support of "points of development" is lighted as a factor of uniting of cultivation environment strategy with the release of "progress enclaves" and a concentration of progress opportunities there. So, foresight programming is studied in accordance with the ability to succeed in the new opportunities and threats, using social and economic innovation of time. In particular, complexity and concentration of decisions and actions are studied as an important precursor of foresight applications productivity. At the same time technologies of "brainstorming", "infection of development", SWOT-analysis, focus groups, scenario planning, etc. are often involved today as methodologies. Accordingly, a state of enlightenment and conveying of innovations are recorded and played back as. To produce new (and integrated in a synergistic burst) capabilities of the subconscious and consciousness at the individual and social levels, irrational and rational bases of creativity are used. Co-operation of different quality resource and methodological bases provides opportunities of public-private partnerships when estimating the range of possible scenarios and models of development highlights horizons transformations. Foresight programs provide intensive finding productive work in conditions of specific solutions. Accordingly, the efficiency of their application involves a balanced account of the real actors and a developable contradictions, application and implementation of protocols to achieve consensus. From this perspective, the fundamental social value of foresight - the implementation of social cohesion productive while taking advantage of networking features and flexible communications. Engaging socially significant projects, creating flexible social networks of the most active participants, updated passionaries' creativity is regarded as one of the decisive factors in the transformation of foresight serious argument of competitive contests of cultural and civilizational worlds. Thus, the use of foresight methodologies programming is effective in developing opportunities. If there are procedural and technological compliance, diversity and competence attracted sufficient, motivated and ready to participate in socially relevant communications expert community flexible moderatership, loyal weighing assess the situation and correct the projections for the campaign, it can be a serious factor for sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Volodymyr Shedyakov, 2014. "Foresight Programming And The Improving Of Decision-Making Efficiency," Ukrainian Journal Ekonomist, Yuriy Kovalenko, issue 6, pages 29-33, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:uje:journl:y:2014:i:6:p:29-33
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uje:journl:y:2014:i:6:p:29-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vadym Bardas' (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://ua-ekonomist.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.