IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/uje/journl/y2014i2p37-40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Property Relations Reformation In Forest Management Field: Priorities And Restrictions

Author

Listed:
  • Anatoliy Karpuk

    (National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv)

Abstract

We consider the ownership of forest resources and forest lands, regulated by national regulatory and legal framework. The most resonant issues of reform of forest property are the possibility of institutionalization of private ownership and the transfer of some forest land in communal ownership. Forcing the process of creating communal forest ownership is appropriate, when they removed all the controversy concerning the delimitation of land within and outside the settlements, and when local communities will have broader powers to local budget revenues and be able to make deals with the subjects of forestry businesses capable of augmenting forest potential settlements and surrounding areas. It is necessary to significantly diversify the temporary use of forests to enhance entrepreneurial activity in the harvesting and primary processing of wood. In view of this it is necessary to legitimize the possibility of implementation in practice of forest management lease schemes of concession regime, production sharing agreements and asset management.

Suggested Citation

  • Anatoliy Karpuk, 2014. "Property Relations Reformation In Forest Management Field: Priorities And Restrictions," Ukrainian Journal Ekonomist, Yuriy Kovalenko, issue 2, pages 37-40, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:uje:journl:y:2014:i:2:p:37-40
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uje:journl:y:2014:i:2:p:37-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vadym Bardas' (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://ua-ekonomist.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.