Susan Chaplinsky (University of Virginia) Latha Ramchand (University of Houston)
Abstract
In 1990, the SEC approved Rule 144A, a reform permitting firms to raise capital from "qualified institutional buyers" without requiring registration of the securities and compliance with U.S. GAAP. The rule was intended to help international firms reduce the costs of meeting U.S. disclosure standards. We examine the borrowing costs of international issuers in the 144A market. Investment grade 144A debt has significantly higher yield spreads, whereas high-yield 144A debt has yield spreads comparable to public debt. The results suggest a bifurcation of the markets, where high-quality firms issue in both markets but face higher spreads in the 144A market and low-quality firms issue only in the 144A market.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Article provided by University of Chicago Press in its journal Journal of Business.
Volume (Year): 77 (2004) Issue (Month): 4 (October) Pages: 1073-1098 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).
Related research
Keywords:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)