This article represents a model economy in which demand deposits represent the optimal financial intermediation. Because these demand deposits are backed in part by an illiquid asset, the in termediary ("bank") is subject to panics in which each agent ration ally decides to withdraw his deposits, making all worse off. Banks ca n prevent panics only through a distortion of the optimal contract. T he government can prevent panics without this distortion by guarantee ing the return from deposits. The moral hazard introduced by this dep osit insurance induces the government to regulate the intermediary's portfolio and returns. Copyright 1988 by the University of Chicago.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Publisher Info
Article provided by University of Chicago Press in its journal Journal of Business.
Volume (Year): 61 (1988) Issue (Month): 1 (January) Pages: 45-64 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).
Related research
Keywords:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
Did you know? All full texts are decentralized with the publishers, none reside on this server, thus making it possible to offer this service for free to all parties.