Mobility Barriers and Tobin's q
AbstractThe cross-sectional relation of Tobin's q to structural features of firms depends on market conditions. Features such as industry concentration; advertising and research and development intensity; firm specialization; and proxies for the use of specialized resources can operate as barriers to entry or to exit, depending on the direction of expectations. Regressions of q on structural features over periods when the "state of the economy" was clearly different strongly confirm this view. For example, concentration was positively related to q in the mid-1960s but negatively related in the mid-1970s. Coefficients for all structural variables also changed significantly. This implies that structural features must be interpreted as indexes of resources flexibility rather than as sources of stable positive rents. Copyright 1987 by the University of Chicago.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by University of Chicago Press in its journal Journal of Business.
Volume (Year): 60 (1987)
Issue (Month): 4 (October)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JB/
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Orazem, Peter & Bouillon, Marvin & Doran, B. Michael, 2004.
"Long-Term Attachments and Long-Run Firm Rates of Return,"
Staff General Research Papers
11577, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
- Peter F. Orazem & Marvin L. Bouillon & Benjamin M. Doran, 2004. "Long-Term Attachments and Long-Run Firm Rates of Return," Southern Economic Journal, Southern Economic Association, vol. 71(2), pages 314-333, October.
- Shah, Syed Zulfiqar Ali & Stark, Andrew W. & Akbar, Saeed, 2009. "The value relevance of major media advertising expenditures: Some U.K. evidence," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 187-206, June.
- Hasan, Iftekhar & Hunter, William Curt & MathisIII, Roswell E., 2000. "Promotional Expenditures, Market Competition, and Thrift Behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 177-184, November.
- Gleason, Katherine I. & Klock, Mark, 2006. "Intangible capital in the pharmaceutical and chemical industry," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 300-314, May.
- Braun, Gary P. & Traichal, Patrick A., 1999. "Competitiveness and the convergence of international business practice: North American evidence after NAFTA," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 107-122.
- Cazavan-Jeny, Anne, 2003. "Value-relevance of expensed and capitalized intangibles - a French survey," ESSEC Working Papers DR 03022, ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Journals Division).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.