This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

The Constitutionality of Race-Conscious Redistricting: An Empirical Analysis

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Crain, W Mark

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court's 1993 decision in Shaw v. Reno marked a significant turning point in the legal construction of legislative districts. In Shaw the high court shaped the principle that legislative districts based predominantly on race can survive strict constitutional scrutiny only under extraordinary circumstances. The Court's decisions between 1993 and 1996 abruptly constrained the prevailing interpretation and implementation of the Voting Rights Act. Despite what appears to be a resounding rejection of race-conscious redistricting, the Supreme Court's opinions emphasize a state's right to use race as a criterion and even to create majority-minority districts. Under what conditions race-conscious districts might pass strict constitutional scrutiny remains a murky question. This question motivates the paper. I seek to provide analysis and empirical evidence relevant to the constitutionality of districts in which racial or ethnic considerations predominate. Copyright 2001 by the University of Chicago.

Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Publisher Info
Article provided by University of Chicago Press in its journal Journal of Legal Studies.

Volume (Year): 30 (2001)
Issue (Month): 1 (January)
Pages: 193-221
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:v:30:y:2001:i:1:p:193-221

Contact details of provider:
Postal: The University of Chicago Press, Journals Division, P.O. Box 37005 Chicago, IL 60637
Fax: (773) 753-0811
Email:
Web page: http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JLS/

Order Information:
Web: http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JLS/order1.html

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

Related research
Keywords:

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Rex Pjesky & Daniel Sutter, 2002. "Searching for cincinnatus: Representatives' backgrounds and voting behavior," Atlantic Economic Journal, International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 30(1), pages 74-86, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Edward J. Lopez & R. Todd Jewell, 2005. "Strategic Institutional Choice: Voters, States, and Congressional Term Limits," Public Economics 0512006, EconWPA. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? You too can volunteer for RePEc, for example by providing information about publications in your institution.

This page was last updated on 2009-10-19.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.