Advertising Restrictions and Competition in the Childrenâ€™s Breakfast Cereal Industry
AbstractIn this article I analyze the consequences of advertising in the childrenâ€™s breakfast cereal market. I take advantage of the prohibition on advertising directed at children in the province of Quebec to examine the nature of advertising and to determine whether the restriction hinders competition. I show that prices are higher in Quebec than in Canadian provinces that permit advertising. This finding suggests that the informative role of advertising dominates any persuasive role, since the most likely explanation is that the restriction prevented firms from announcing products' existence or characteristics and thus from overcoming perceived differentiation. If advertising is informative, restricting it should increase the market shares of older, better-known brands and decrease the market shares of newer and/or less well known brands. Empirical analysis supports this prediction: market shares of established brands are larger in Quebec than in the rest of Canada, and the opposite is true for nonestablished brands.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by University of Chicago Press in its journal The Journal of Law and Economics.
Volume (Year): 50 (2007)
Issue (Month): ()
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JLE/
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Journals Division).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.