Cue Representation and Selection Effects of Arousal on Persuasion
AbstractA popular prediction in persuasion research is that decreased ability to process information increases reliance on peripheral cues and decreases reliance on central claims. This article explains why this prediction does not necessarily hold when processing capacity is impaired by high arousal. Three experiments suggest that two types of processes underlie arousal effects on persuasion. Arousal induces selective processing of cues that are diagnostic at the expense of cues that are nondiagnostic--the selection effect. Arousal may also dilute the influence of cues that are capacity demanding--the representation effect. It is therefore important to disentangle the diagnosticity of persuasion cues from their processing demands. Copyright 1996 by the University of Chicago.
Download InfoTo our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by University of Chicago Press in its journal Journal of Consumer Research.
Volume (Year): 22 (1996)
Issue (Month): 4 (March)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JCR/
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Bonaccio, Silvia & Reeve, Charlie L., 2006. "Consideration of preference shifts due to relative attribute variability," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 101(2), pages 200-214, November.
- Pieters, R. & Warlop, L., 1998. "Visual Attention During Brand Choice: The Impact of Time Pressure and Task Motivation," Discussion Paper 1998-69, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
- Muthukrishnan, A. V. & Pham, Michel Tuan & Mungale, Amitabh, 1999. "Comparison Opportunity and Judgment Revision," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 228-251, December.
- Ruiz, Salvador & Sicilia, Maria, 2004. "The impact of cognitive and/or affective processing styles on consumer response to advertising appeals," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(6), pages 657-664, June.
- Chatzigeorgiou, Chryssoula & Christou, Evangelos & Kassianidis, Panagiotis & Sigala, Marianna, 2009. "Examining the Relationship between Emotions, Customer Satisfaction and Future Behavioral Intentions in Agrotourism," MPRA Paper 25355, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 28 Sep 2009.
- Dewitte, Siegfried & Pandelaere, Mario & Briers, Barbara & Warlop, Luk, 2005. "Cognitive load has negative after effects on consumer decision making," Open Access publications from Katholieke Universiteit Leuven urn:hdl:123456789/82743, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Journals Division).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.