IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tra/jlabre/v27y2006i4p473-504.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The AFL-CIO v. CTW: The Competing Visions, Strategies, and Structures

Author

Listed:
  • MARICK F. MASTERS
  • RAY GIBNEY
  • TOM ZAGENCZYK

Abstract

As the AFL-CIO approached its twenty-fifth biennial convention in July 2005, seven unions formed a new Change to Win (CTW) coalition to challenge the federation for lead position as the voice of the labor movement. These unions, most of which have disaffiliated from the AFL-CIO, formed the CTW to demonstrate their unsparing discontent with John Sweeney's leadership of the federation. We examine the reasons for the current breach in the house of labor, the competing visions offered by the AFL-CIO and CTW, and the likelihood that the CTW's strategy will revive unions. We find that the gulf between the two factions is philosophically deep and practically irreconcilable. The CTW advocates an "engineered breakthrough" approach to revitalize labor whereas the AFL-CIO relies on a more conservative "accelerated evolution" path. There are no guarantees that the CTW's strategy will work. It presupposes an unmet demand for unions that can be tapped through vast new investments. If the current model of unionism is lacking, as the CTW suggests, a viable replacement must be found. The CTW, with its limited resources, will have to experiment until it finds the right model, if one does indeed exist. The task of rebuilding labor is daunting, but it arguably requires a bold and fundamentally different course from what has been pursued. From this perspective, the breakup seems a logical development.

Suggested Citation

  • Marick F. Masters & Ray Gibney & Tom Zagenczyk, 2006. "The AFL-CIO v. CTW: The Competing Visions, Strategies, and Structures," Journal of Labor Research, Transaction Publishers, vol. 27(4), pages 473-504, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:tra:jlabre:v:27:y:2006:i:4:p:473-504
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://transactionpub.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=91TPA7BPQ19U6L7W
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ray Gibney & Marick Masters & Ozge Aybat & Thomas Amlie, 2018. "“I Know I Am, But What Are You?”: Public Perceptions of Unions, Members and Joining Intentions," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-14, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tra:jlabre:v:27:y:2006:i:4:p:473-504. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://transactionpub.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&id=110581 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.