IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tra/jlabre/v27y2006i2p213-236.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Correlates of Satisfaction with Performance Appraisal Feedback

Author

Listed:
  • I.M. JAWAHAR

Abstract

The relative lack of research on employees' reactions to performance appraisal feedback is the primary impetus for this study which advances this important, but neglected, research area by investigating potential predictors and consequences of satisfaction with appraisal feedback. Survey responses from 112 employees were matched with their performance ratings from two different appraisal periods to test specific hypotheses. Results indicate that satisfaction with rater and previous performance ratings influence employees' satisfaction with appraisal feedback. Satisfaction with appraisal feedback was positively related to job satisfaction and organizational commitment and negatively related to turnover intentions. Supervisory status moderated the relationship between satisfaction with appraisal feedback and subsequent performance such that the relationship existed only for supervisory employees who, in addition to receiving feedback about their own performance, also provided feedback to their subordinates. Implications of results for researchers and practitioners are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • I.M. Jawahar, 2006. "Correlates of Satisfaction with Performance Appraisal Feedback," Journal of Labor Research, Transaction Publishers, vol. 27(2), pages 213-236, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:tra:jlabre:v:27:y:2006:i:2:p:213-236
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://transactionpub.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=8KT3N8JM39LQVCYX
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anupriya Singh & Tanuja Agarwala, 2011. "Software Services Industry Context and Performance Management," Vision, , vol. 15(1), pages 49-59, March.
    2. Deepak Chawla & Afsha Dokadia & Snigdha Rai, 2017. "Multigenerational Differences in Career Preferences, Reward Preferences and Work Engagement among Indian Employees," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 18(1), pages 181-197, February.
    3. Lidetu Alemu Anjulo, 2021. "The Existing Performance Evaluation Practices Of Private Companies And Employees Perception Towards The Action: In The Case Of Some Insurance Companies Wolaita Sodo City, Southern Ethiopia," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 10(1), pages 8-16, March.
    4. Suhaimi Sudin Author_Email: ssuhaimi@uniten.edu.my, 2011. "Fairness Of And Satisfaction With Performance Appraisal Process," 2nd International Conference on Business and Economic Research (2nd ICBER 2011) Proceeding 2011-247, Conference Master Resources.
    5. Kamalpreet Kaur Paposa & Y. Mohit Kumar, 2015. "Impact of Performance Management System on Job Satisfaction of Faculty Members: A Study on Technical Education Institutes of Nagpur," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 40(1-2), pages 159-175, February.
    6. Nguyen Ngoc Mai & Vo Hoang Ngoc Thuy, 2021. "Talent Retention at Commercial Banks in Vietnam," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 11(1), pages 48-59.
    7. Siqing Shan & Cangyan Li & Wei Yao & Jihong Shi & Jie Ren, 2014. "An Empirical Study on Critical Factors Affecting Employee Satisfaction," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 447-460, May.
    8. Suhaimi Sudin, 2011. "Fairness Of And Satisfaction With Performance Appraisal Process," Journal of Global Management, Global Research Agency, vol. 2(1), pages 66-83, July.
    9. Patrick Kampkötter, 2014. "Performance Appraisals and Job Satisfaction," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 672, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tra:jlabre:v:27:y:2006:i:2:p:213-236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://transactionpub.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&id=110581 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.