This file is part of IDEAS , which uses RePEc data
[ Papers |
Articles |
Software |
Books |
Chapters |
Authors |
Institutions |
JEL Classification |
NEP reports |
Search |
New papers by email |
Author registration |
Rankings |
Volunteers |
FAQ |
Blog |
Help! ]
Mergers, Cartels, Set-Asides, and Bidding Preferences in Asymmetric Oral Auctions Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics Lance Brannman
Luke M. Froeb
Additional information is available for the following
registered author(s):
From bidding data, we estimate the underlying value distribution for Forest Service timber. We find that bidder values decrease $2/mbf (thousand board feet) with each mile from the tract and that small firms (fewer than 500 employees) have values that are $72/mbf lower than large firms. The empirical value distribution is used to simulate various hypothetical scenarios designed to inform public policy. The most anticompetitive mergers raise price by less than 3%, and a 4% decline in marginal costs through greater merger efficiencies is enough to offset a 1% anticompetitive price increase. Eliminating the SBA set-aside program would raise timber revenues by 15%. A policy of granting bidding preferences to small and more-distant bidders would raise revenue by approximately one-tenth of one percent. © 2000 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page . Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Article provided by MIT Press in its journal The Review of Economics and Statistics .
Volume (Year): 82 (2000)
Issue (Month): 2 (May)
Pages: 283-290
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract ),
plain text
(with abstract ),
BibTeX ,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:tpr:restat:v:82:y:2000:i:2:p:283-290Contact details of provider: Web page: http://mitpress.mit.edu/journals/
Order Information: Web: http://mitpress.mit.edu/journal-home.tcl?issn=00346535
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).
Keywords: Cited by : (explanations , Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile , click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
Harrison Cheng, 2005.
"Ranking Sealed High-Bid and Open Asymmetric Auctions ,"
IEPR Working Papers
05.26, Institute of Economic Policy Research (IEPR).
[Downloadable!]
Srabana Gupta, 2001.
"The Effect of Bid Rigging on Prices: A Study of the Highway Construction Industry ,"
Review of Industrial Organization ,
Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 451-465, December.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Gregory J. Werden, Luke M. Froeb, James Langenfeld, 2000.
"Lost Profits from Patent Infringement: The Simulation Approach ,"
International Journal of the Economics of Business ,
Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 213-227, July.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Keith Waehrer & Martin Perry, 2002.
"The Effects of Mergers in Open Auction Markets ,"
Departmental Working Papers
200203, Rutgers University, Department of Economics.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions: Ivaldi, Marc & Motis, Jrissy, 2007.
"Mergers as Auctions ,"
IDEI Working Papers
461, Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
Access and
download statistics Did you know? Each page is provided with a technical contact, in case something is not right with the supplied information. See under "publisher info".
This page was last updated on 2009-11-16.
This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics , College of Liberal Arts and Sciences , University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics .