IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/restat/v61y1979i2p180-89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Residential Electricity Demand: An Experimental Study

Author

Listed:
  • Battalio, Raymond C, et al

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Battalio, Raymond C, et al, 1979. "Residential Electricity Demand: An Experimental Study," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 61(2), pages 180-189, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:tpr:restat:v:61:y:1979:i:2:p:180-89
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0034-6535%28197905%2961%3A2%3C180%3AREDAES%3E2.0.CO%3B2-E&origin=repec
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kendel, Adnane & Lazaric, Nathalie & Maréchal, Kevin, 2017. "What do people ‘learn by looking’ at direct feedback on their energy consumption? Results of a field study in Southern France," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 593-605.
    2. Sexton, Richard J. & Johnson, Nancy Brown & Konakayama, Akira, 1986. "Consumer Response To Continuous-Display Electricity-Use Monitors In A Time-Use Pricing Experiment," Working Papers 225803, University of California, Davis, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    3. Delmas, Magali A. & Fischlein, Miriam & Asensio, Omar I., 2013. "Information strategies and energy conservation behavior: A meta-analysis of experimental studies from 1975 to 2012," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 729-739.
    4. Feehan, James P., 2018. "The long-run price elasticity of residential demand for electricity: Results from a natural experiment," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 12-17.
    5. Suter, Jordan F. & Shammin, Md Rumi, 2013. "Returns to residential energy efficiency and conservation measures: A field experiment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 551-561.
    6. Robert W. Hahn & Robert D. Metcalfe, 2021. "Efficiency and Equity Impacts of Energy Subsidies," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 111(5), pages 1658-1688, May.
    7. Giulietti, Monica & Le Coq, Chloé & Willems, Bert & Anaya, Karim, 2019. "Smart Consumers in the Internet of Energy : Flexibility Markets & Services from Distributed Energy Resources," Other publications TiSEM 2edb43b5-bbd6-487d-abdf-7, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Sexton, Richard J. & Johnson, Nancy Brown & Konakayama, Akira, 1985. "Consumer Response To Continuous-Display Electricity-Use Monitors In A Time-Of-Use Pricing Experiment," Working Papers 225799, University of California, Davis, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    9. Tejada-Bailly, Miguel Lorenzo, 1981. "Energy and economic growth in a developing country: the case of Peru to the year 2000," ISU General Staff Papers 198101010800008005, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    10. Davis, Alexander L. & Krishnamurti, Tamar & Fischhoff, Baruch & Bruine de Bruin, Wandi, 2013. "Setting a standard for electricity pilot studies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 401-409.
    11. Paolo Zangheri & Tiago Serrenho & Paolo Bertoldi, 2019. "Energy Savings from Feedback Systems: A Meta-Studies’ Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-18, October.
    12. Karlin, Beth & Sanguinetti, Angela & Davis, Nora & Bendanna, Kristen & Holdsworth, Kristen & Baker, Jessie & Kirkby, David & Stokols, Daniel, 2015. "Diffusion of Feedback: Perceptions and Adoption of Devices in the Residential Market," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt0cv5g621, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    13. Bergstrom, John C. & Stoll, John R., 1989. "Application Of Experimentatal Economics Concepts And Precepts To Cvm Field Survey Procedures," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:restat:v:61:y:1979:i:2:p:180-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kelly McDougall (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.