This file is part of IDEAS , which uses RePEc data
[ Papers |
Articles |
Software |
Books |
Chapters |
Authors |
Institutions |
JEL Classification |
NEP reports |
Search |
New papers by email |
Author registration |
Rankings |
Volunteers |
FAQ |
Blog |
Help! ]
Most-Favored-Nation Clauses and Clustered Negotiations Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics Robert Pahre
Though substantively important, centralized negotiations have received less theoretical attention than problems of centralized monitoring and enforcement. I address this gap by examining variation in a particular form of centralized negotiations that I call "clustering." Clustering occurs when a state negotiates with several other states at the same time. Clustering enables states to avoid having to make concessions on the same issue to one state after another, and therefore has important distributional advantages. Clustering also centralizes bargaining within a regime, especially when several states cluster simultaneously in a "macro-cluster." I propose several hypotheses about clustering. First, most-favored-nation (MFN) clauses are a necessary condition for clustering. They link the distributional conflicts among many pairs of countries and make centralized bargaining more likely. Second, increasing membership in the trade regime makes clustering more likely. This relationship between membership and centralization echoes Rational Design conjecture C3, increases with CENTRALIZATION , though the causal mechanism differs significantly. Third, clustering provides NUMBER distributional advantages to those who cluster. A state that clusters, such as France under the Me´line tariff or Germany under Chancellors Leo von Caprivi and Bernard von Bu¨low, will make fewer concessions than one that does not. © 2001 The IO Foundation and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page . Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Article provided by MIT Press in its journal International Organization .
Volume (Year): 55 (2001)
Issue (Month): 4 (October)
Pages: 859-890
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract ),
plain text
(with abstract ),
BibTeX ,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:tpr:intorg:v:55:y:2001:i:4:p:859-890Contact details of provider:
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).
Keywords:
Access and
download statistics Did you know? Authors registered on the RePEc Author Service receive monthly emails with details about downloads and abstract views of their works.
This page was last updated on 2009-12-28.
This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics , College of Liberal Arts and Sciences , University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics .