IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/glenvp/v1y2001i2p71-94.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Global Environment Facility-a Role Model for International Governance?

Author

Listed:
  • Charlotte Streck

Abstract

Today's fragmented world demands creative institutional arrangements to allow governments, international organizations and civil society actors to address transboundary and international problems. This article examines if and how the Global Environment Facility (GEF) can serve as a testing ground to find new ways to address such global problems in multilateral cooperation. After outlining the GEF's history, institutional setting and participatory elements, the paper points out some of its crucial weaknesses and flaws, such as insufficient private sector involvement, and the problem of power asymmetries. At the same time, however, the GEF can serve as a role model for international cooperation in many ways. More than any other international agency, the GEF is able to adapt to a constantly changing environment. The governance system of the GEF brings together advantages of both the UN and the Bretton Woods institutional rules and cultures. And it has a strong participatory element that includes close cooperation with nongovernmental actors. Copyright (c) 2001 Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Charlotte Streck, 2001. "The Global Environment Facility-a Role Model for International Governance?," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 1(2), pages 71-94, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:1:y:2001:i:2:p:71-94
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1162/152638001750336604
    File Function: link to full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christopher Pallas & Johannes Urpelainen, 2012. "NGO monitoring and the legitimacy of international cooperation: A strategic analysis," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-32, March.
    2. Steffen Eckhard & Vytautas Jankauskas, 2020. "Explaining the political use of evaluation in international organizations," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 53(4), pages 667-695, December.
    3. Miller, Daniel C., 2014. "Explaining Global Patterns of International Aid for Linked Biodiversity Conservation and Development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 341-359.
    4. Tareq K. Al-Awad & Motasem N. Saidan & Brian J. Gareau, 2018. "Halon management and ozone-depleting substances control in Jordan," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 391-408, June.
    5. Azusa Uji, 2019. "Institutional diffusion for the Minamata Convention on Mercury," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 169-185, April.
    6. Helgason, Kristinn Sv. & Weinlich, Silke, 2015. "Post-2015: recharging governance of United Nations development," Briefing Papers 6/2015, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    7. Julian Clifton, 2011. "Agriculture, Land Use and Conservation Initiatives in Indonesia: Implications for Development and Sustainability," Chapters, in: Matthew Tonts & M. A.B. Siddique (ed.), Globalisation, Agriculture and Development, chapter 11, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:1:y:2001:i:2:p:71-94. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kelly McDougall (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.