IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/veecee/v6y2003i1p1-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inflating the bubble: examining dot-com investor behaviour

Author

Listed:
  • Dave Valliere
  • Rein Peterson

Abstract

Findings are presented from a study of the cognitive behaviours of 57 venture capital investors in the early-stage technology sector during the 1998 -- 2001 Internet bubble period. The inductive research methodology was based on open-ended qualitative interviews with investment practitioners, conducted by the lead author who was an investment practitioner during the bubble. The data obtained were used to develop a grounded model of how generally accepted venture capital industry decision-making practices were bypassed and modified by investors competing intensively in an unfamiliar sector with unknown success criteria, which contributed to the creation of the bubble. Insights from prospect theory, attribution theory and cognitive dissonance theory were used to identify the cognitive processes that led through groupthink to the development of a conceptual framework in the industry, similar to what organizational theorist Gareth Morgan has called a Psychic Prison. The study identified four positive feedback loops in the environment surrounding the activities of Internet investors that contributed to the bypassing of generally accepted practices by investors who believed they were behaving rationally.

Suggested Citation

  • Dave Valliere & Rein Peterson, 2003. "Inflating the bubble: examining dot-com investor behaviour," Venture Capital, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 1-22, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:veecee:v:6:y:2003:i:1:p:1-22
    DOI: 10.1080/1369106032000152452
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1369106032000152452
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1369106032000152452?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:veecee:v:6:y:2003:i:1:p:1-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TVEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.