IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/servic/v23y2003i2p166-182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A method for the assessment of relative brand strength: a UK tour operator example

Author

Listed:
  • David Gilbert
  • James Hewlett

Abstract

This study provides a method of uncovering the brand strengths and weaknesses of major tour operators in the UK. It provides an approach that provides a weighted assessment of attributes which is a culmination of the weighting of all measures from a two stage research model. The study provides a method that can be applied elsewhere but specifically identified Airtours as having the lowest score for brand attributes and image, a result that may well be associated to their previous rejection of branding in favour of maintaining low prices to customers. From the core values identified, it became evident that most operators' worst score was for efficiency. Perhaps the most predictable of the findings was that the Virgin brand was most familiar to younger respondents. Age was a major variable in terms of the ranking of the attributes. Over 55s ranked accommodation, efficiency, reliability and reputation higher than any other age category. Such consistency indicates that the more senior age group has greater expectations of the services offered by the tour operators, or else require a better service in order to be satisfied. A gap in the market was identified for a brand to promote itself as part of the emotional holiday experience in addition to performing the basic operator functions. Such market positioning would also present opportunities for brand differentiation. In conclusion this study has implications for other brand assessment exercises and therefore offers a model of approach for other sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • David Gilbert & James Hewlett, 2003. "A method for the assessment of relative brand strength: a UK tour operator example," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 166-182, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:servic:v:23:y:2003:i:2:p:166-182
    DOI: 10.1080/02642060412331300942
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02642060412331300942
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02642060412331300942?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:servic:v:23:y:2003:i:2:p:166-182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FSIJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.