This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Preference Formation and the Axioms of Choice

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
S. Abu Turab Rizvi
Abstract

Standard economic arguments assume that individual preferences satisfy particular axioms of choice (e.g. transitivity or acyclicity). At the same time, preferences are taken as given for purposes of analysis. However, since preferences are formed, the process of formation will affect the preferences created. This article argues that the process of preference formation will not generally result in preferences satisfying the axioms of choice. This result follows from considering preference formation as an intrapersonal version of Sen's Paretian Liberal paradox. This result requires a number of conditions, which are re-interpreted in the setting of individual preference formation and are shown to be reasonable. Several plausible examples show that the impossibility arises in uncontrived and natural situations. The article then outlines the relation of these arguments to other concerns about preference rankings. It concludes that the burden carried in economics and in other disciplines by standard preference rankings or utility functions is misplaced: such rankings are likely to be available to individuals in straightforward circumstances. On the other hand, these conclusions buttress arguments for a conception of preferences that is richer than is possible in standard economics.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://taylorandfrancis.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=JT98F86RL8NEAY7F
File Format: text/html
File Function:
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Publisher Info
Article provided by Taylor and Francis Journals in its journal Review of Political Economy.

Volume (Year): 13 (2001)
Issue (Month): 2 (April)
Pages: 141-159
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:13:y:2001:i:2:p:141-159

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://taylorandfrancis.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&id=102233

Order Information:
Web: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/subscription.html

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

Related research
Keywords:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

  1. Kelly, Jerry S, 1976. "The Impossibility of a Just Liberal," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 43(169), pages 67-75, February. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Field, Alexander James, 1984. "Microeconomics, Norms, and Rationality," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 32(4), pages 683-711, July.
  3. Ted Bergstrom, 1975. "Maximal elements of Acyclic Relations on Compact Sets," University of California at Santa Barbara, Economics Working Paper Series 1975B, Department of Economics, UC Santa Barbara. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  4. Sen, Amartya, 1970. "The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 78(1), pages 152-57, Jan.-Feb.. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  5. Boland, Lawrence A, 1983. "The Neoclassical Maximization Hypothesis: Reply," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 73(4), pages 828-30, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  6. Hirshleifer, Jack, 1985. "The Expanding Domain of Economics," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(6), pages 53-68, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  7. Boland, Lawrence A, 1981. "On the Futility of Criticizing the Neoclassical Maximization Hypothesis," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 71(5), pages 1031-36, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  8. Benhabib, Jess & Day, Richard H, 1981. "Rational Choice and Erratic Behaviour," Review of Economic Studies, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 48(3), pages 459-71, July. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  9. Elster, Jon, 1989. "Social Norms and Economic Theory," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 3(4), pages 99-117, Fall. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  10. Sen, Amartya K, 1973. "Behaviour and the Concept of Preference," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 40(159), pages 241-59, August. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  11. Caldwell, Bruce J, 1983. "The Neoclassical Maximization Hypothesis: Comment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 73(4), pages 824-27, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  12. Schelling, Thomas C, 1984. "Self-Command in Practice, in Policy, and in a Theory of Rational Choice," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 74(2), pages 1-11, May.
  13. Duffie, Darrell & Sonnenschein, Hugo, 1989. "Arrow and General Equilibrium Theory," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 27(2), pages 565-98, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  14. Loomes, Graham & Starmer, Chris & Sugden, Robert, 1989. "Preference Reversal: Information-Processing Effect or Rational Non-transitive Choice?," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 99(395), pages 140-51, Supplemen. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  15. Gintis, Herbert, 1974. "Welfare Criteria with Endogenous Preferences: The Economics of Education," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 15(2), pages 415-30, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  16. Stigler, George J & Becker, Gary S, 1977. "De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 67(2), pages 76-90, March.
  17. Broome, John, 1978. "Choice and Value in Economics," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 30(3), pages 313-33, November. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  18. Pollak, Robert A, 1978. "Endogenous Tastes in Demand and Welfare Analysis," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 68(2), pages 374-79, May.
  19. Hammond, Peter J, 1976. "Changing Tastes and Coherent Dynamic Choice," Review of Economic Studies, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 43(1), pages 159-73, February. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  20. Elster, Jon, 1985. "Weakness of will and the free-rider problem," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 293-294, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  21. Akerlof, George A & Dickens, William T, 1982. "The Economic Consequences of Cognitive Dissonance," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 72(3), pages 307-19, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  22. Hodgson, Geoff, 1986. "Behind Methodological Individualism," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(3), pages 211-24, September.
  23. Thaler, Richard H & Shefrin, H M, 1981. "An Economic Theory of Self-Control," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 89(2), pages 392-406, April. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  24. Chris Starmer, 1996. "Explaining risky choices without assuming preferences," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 201-213, April. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  25. Mukherji, Anjan, 1977. "The Existence of Choice Functions," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 45(4), pages 889-94, May. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  26. Blau, Julian H, 1975. "Liberal Values and Independence," Review of Economic Studies, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 42(3), pages 395-401, July. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  27. Winston, Gordon C., 1980. "Addiction and backsliding : A theory of compulsive consumption," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 1(4), pages 295-324, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  28. Gintis, Herbert, 1972. "A Radical Analysis of Welfare Economics and Individual Development," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol. 86(4), pages 572-99, November. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  29. Schelling, Thomas C, 1978. "Egonomics, or the Art of Self-Management," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 68(2), pages 290-94, May. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  30. Loomes, Graham & Starmer, Chris & Sugden, Robert, 1991. "Observing Violations of Transitivity by Experimental Methods," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 59(2), pages 425-39, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  31. Sugden, Robert, 1989. "Spontaneous Order," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 3(4), pages 85-97, Fall. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? All RePEc services are meant to be be free forever, as they are all run by volunteers.

This page was last updated on 2008-7-1.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.