IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v32y1998i4p325-332.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Plant Size and Industry-mix Effects on UK Regional Productivity, Wage Costs and Operating Surplus

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Roper

Abstract

ROPER S. (1998) Plant size and industry-mix effects on UK regional productivity, wage costs and operating surplus, Reg. Studies 32 , 325-332. The ability of a region to create wealth depends both on the competitiveness of its individual firms and its industrial structure. This paper examines the effect of industry-mix and plant size structure on the wealth generating capacity of the UK regions from 1980-91. Reflecting the findings of similar US studies, the analysis suggests that, in general, UK regions' structural disadvantages act to reinforce rather than counter plant level productivity, wage cost and operating surplus (profitability) differentials. Thus lagging regions face a three-fold disadvantage: poorly performing plants; disadvantageous industry-mix; and plant size structure. This suggests a need for a strategic approach to policy which must aim to counter regions' structural disadvantages as well as to improve the competitiveness of existing plants. ROPER S. (1998) Les effets de la taille des etablissements et de la structure industrielle sur la productivite, les couts salariaux et le resultat d'exploitation au Royaume-Uni, Reg. Studies 32 , 325-332. La capacite d'une region a creer de la richesse depend a la fois de la competitivite de ses entreprises et de sa structure industrielle. Cet article examine les effets de la structure industrielle et de la taille des entreprises sur la capacite des regions au Royaume-Uni a creer de la richesse entre 1980 et 1991. En accord avec les resultats des etudes similaires faites aux Etats-Unis, l'analyse laisse supposer qu'en regle generale les inconvenients structurels des regions au Royaume-Uni servent a renforcer plutot qu'a neutraliser les ecarts de productivite, des couts salariaux et du resultat d'exploitation (rentabilite) au niveau des etablissements. Par la suite, les regions defavorisees doivent affronter un desavantage a triple tranchant; la presence des etablissements qui ont de mauvais resultats, une structure industrielle et une ventilation des etablissements par taille defavorables. Cela laisse supposer qu'il faut une approche strategique qui doit chercher a neutraliser les inconvenients structurels des regions aussi bien qu'ameliorer la competitivite des etablissements existants. ROPER S. (1998) Die Auswirkung des Umfangs von Werksanlagen und Industriemischung auf regionale Produktivitat, Lohnkosten und Betriebsrentabilitat im Vereinigten Konigreich, Reg. Studies 32 , 325-332. Die Fahigkeit einer Region, Vermogen zu schaffen, hangt sowohl von der Wettbewerbsfahigkeit ihrer einzelnen Firmen als auch von ihrer industriellen Struktur ab. Dieser Aufsatz untersucht die Auswirkung von Industriemischung und Grossenstruktur von Werksanlagen auf die Fahigkeit der Regionen des Vereinigten Konigreichs, im Zeitraum 1980-91 Vermogen zu schaffen. Wie auch die Befunde ahnlicher Studien in den USA, legt die Analyse nahe, dass die strukturellen Vorteile der Regionen des Vereinigten Konigreichs im allgemeinen eher dazu dienen, Leistungshohe, Lohnkosten und Rentabilitat von Betrieben zu unterbauen als ihnen zuwiderzulaufen. So sehen zuruckgebliebene Regionen sich einem dreifachen Nachteil gegenuber: ihre Aufgaben schlecht erfullenden Betrieben, nachteiliger Industriemischung und Betriebsgrossenstruktur. Dies weist auf die Notwendigkeit hin, strategisch auf Vorgehensweisen hinzuarbeiten, die darauf abzielen mussen, sowohl die strukturellen Nachteile der Regionen zu uberwinden wie auch Leistungsfahigkeit der bestehenden Betriebsanlagen zu verbessern.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Roper, 1998. "Plant Size and Industry-mix Effects on UK Regional Productivity, Wage Costs and Operating Surplus," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 325-332.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:32:y:1998:i:4:p:325-332
    DOI: 10.1080/00343409850117780
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343409850117780
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343409850117780?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Malhotra, Devinder M. & Garofalo, Gasper A., 1988. "Analysis of regional productivity with capital as a quasi-fixed factor," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 533-547, November.
    2. Fogarty, Michael S. & Garofalo, Gasper A., 1988. "Urban spatial structure and productivity growth in the manufacturing sector of cities," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 60-70, January.
    3. M. Denny & M. Fuss & J. D. May, 1981. "Intertemporal Changes in Regional Productivity in Canadian Manufacturing," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 14(3), pages 390-408, August.
    4. Sasaki, Komei, 1985. "Regional difference in total factor productivity and spatial features : Empirical Analysis on the Basis of a Sectoral Translog Production Function," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 489-516, November.
    5. Reinganum, Marc R & Smith, Janet Kiholm, 1983. "Investor Preference for Large Firms: New Evidence on Economies of Size," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 213-227, December.
    6. Acs,Zoltan J. & Audretsch,David B. (ed.), 1993. "Small Firms and Entrepreneurship," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521431156.
    7. Barclay Gibbs Jones, 1984. "Productivity And The Spatial Implications Of Structural Change: Empirical Evidence For Simon'S Model," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 1-11, January.
    8. Simon, Herbert A., 1982. "The rural-urban population balance again," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 599-606, November.
    9. Schneider, Friedrich & Lenzelbauer, Werner, 1993. "An Inverse Relationship between Efficiency and Profitability According to Size of (Upper-)Austrian Firms? Some Further Tentative Results," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-22, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Love, James H. & Roper, Stephen, 2000. "Location And Network Effects On Innovation Success: Evidence For Uk, German And Irish Manufacturing Firms," ERSA conference papers ersa00p67, European Regional Science Association.
    2. Love, James H. & Roper, Stephen, 2001. "Location and network effects on innovation success: evidence for UK, German and Irish manufacturing plants," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 643-661, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shelby Gerking, 1993. "Measuring Productivity Growth in U.S. Regions: A Survey," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 16(1-2), pages 155-185, April.
    2. Luis Suarez-Villa, 1988. "Metropolitan Evolution, Sectoral Economic Change, and the City Size Distribution," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 25(1), pages 1-20, February.
    3. JOrge Alonso Lotero Contreras & Sergio Restrepo & Liliana Yaned Franco Vásquez, 2000. "Modelos de desarrollo y convergencia interregional de la productividad industrial en Colombia," Lecturas de Economía, Universidad de Antioquia, Departamento de Economía, issue 52, pages 51-85, Enero Jun.
    4. Nijkamp, P. & Stough, R. & Sahin, M., 2009. "Impact of social and human capital on business performance of migrant entrepreneurs - a comparative dutch-us study," Serie Research Memoranda 0017, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    5. Henrekson, Magnus & Johansson, Dan, 1999. "Institutional Effects on the Evolution of the Size Distribution of Firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 11-23, February.
    6. Bernadette Power & Gavin C Reid, 2003. "Turbulence, Flexibility and Performance of the Long-lived Small Firm," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 03-039/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    7. Melvyn A. Fuss & Leonard Waverman, 1985. "Productivity Growth in the Automobile Industry, 1970-1980: A Comparisonof Canada, Japan and the United States," NBER Working Papers 1735, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Daniel J. Graham & Nigel Spence, 2000. "Manufacturing Employment Change, Output Demand, and Labor Productivity in the Regions of Britain," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 23(2), pages 172-200, April.
    9. David B. Audretsch & Martin A. Carree & Adriaan J. Van Stel & A. Roy Thurik, 2002. "Impeded Industrial Restructuring: The Growth Penalty," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), pages 81-98.
    10. Vitols, Sigurt, 1995. "German banks and the modernization of the small firm sector: long-term finance in comparative perspective," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economic Change and Employment FS I 95-309, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    11. Charles R. Hulten & Robert M. Schwab, 1993. "Endogenous Growth, Public Capital, and the Convergence of Regional Manufacturing Industries," NBER Working Papers 4538, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Mercedes Gumbau-Albert & Joaquín Maudos, 2006. "Technological activity and productivity in the Spanish regions," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 40(1), pages 55-80, March.
    13. Sebastián Aparicio & Andrés Ramírez Hassan & Diego Fernando Gómez Sánchez, 2013. "Elección de ocupaciones que generen empleo usando modelos de elección discreta: Medellín Área Metropolitana 2009," Estudios Gerenciales, Universidad Icesi, December.
    14. Faria, João Ricardo & Cuestas, Juan Carlos & Mourelle, Estefanía, 2010. "Entrepreneurship and unemployment: A nonlinear bidirectional causality?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 1282-1291, September.
    15. Emília Malcata-Rebelo & Paulo Pinho, 2010. "Evaluation and Monitoring of Office Markets," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 37(2), pages 305-325, April.
    16. Bauernschuster, Stefan & Falck, Oliver & Gold, Robert & Heblich, Stephan, 2012. "The shadows of the socialist past: Lack of self-reliance hinders entrepreneurship," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 485-497.
    17. Chowdhury, Biplob & Jeyasreedharan, Nagaratnam & Dungey, Mardi, 2018. "Quantile relationships between standard, diffusion and jump betas across Japanese banks," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 29-47.
    18. Backman, Mikaela & Palmberg, Johanna, 2015. "Contextualizing small family firms: How does the urban–rural context affect firm employment growth?," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 6(4), pages 247-258.
    19. Ingrid Verheul & André Van Stel & Roy Thurik, 2006. "Explaining female and male entrepreneurship at the country level," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 151-183, March.
    20. Klapper, Leora & Sarria-Allende, Virginia & Sulla, Victor, 2002. "Small and medium size enterprise financing in Eastern Europe," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2933, The World Bank.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:32:y:1998:i:4:p:325-332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.