IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v30y1996i2p189-214.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy Review Section

Author

Listed:
  • J. Mawson
  • D. I. Scargill
  • M. R. Jones
  • C. Jones
  • I. Hodge
  • J. Dunn
  • S. Monk

Abstract

In this issue of the Policy Review Section, Ian Scargill of the Department of Geography, University of Oxford, examines the manner in which French public administration is currently responding to the issue of local government fragmentation and has sought to address problems identified in the year long, 1993-94 debate on territorial planning. The article takes as its starting point the incompleteness of the French decentralization reforms of 1982-93 and looks at the current search for a new unit, the Pays, suitable for collaborative local planning. In the second article, Martin Jones of the School of Geography, University of Manchester, presents a critical appraisal of the Association of British Chambers of Commerce proposals for new style Chambers of Commerce and Industry designed to engage business in an effective partnership with government. In the third article, Colin Jones of the Department of Land Economics, University of Paisley, presents an assessment of the recently established regeneration agency English Partnerships. Finally, Ian Hodge, Jessica Dunn and Sarah Monk of the Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge, examine the statistical basis for the Rural Development Commission's recent 1993 review of its Rural Development Areas.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Mawson & D. I. Scargill & M. R. Jones & C. Jones & I. Hodge & J. Dunn & S. Monk, 1996. "Policy Review Section," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 189-214.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:30:y:1996:i:2:p:189-214
    DOI: 10.1080/00343409612331349568
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343409612331349568
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343409612331349568?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:30:y:1996:i:2:p:189-214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.