This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

The effects of local authority fiscal decisions on population levels in urban areas

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Keith Cuthbertson
James Foreman-Peck
Peter Gripaios

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

Cuthbertson K., Foreman-Peck J. and Gripaios P. (1982) The effects of local authority fiscal decisions on population levels in urban areas, Reg. Studies 16, 165--71. The possible effects of local authority tax and expenditure decisions on population levels in local authority jurisdictions have largely been ignored in the UK, despite both theoretical and empirical work in the USA which suggests that such effects could well be important. This paper examines whether discriminatory local fiscal policies are indeed an important determinant of borough population levels in the UK, by first presenting a simple model of population determination and then testing it with 1971 cross section data for the thirty-two London boroughs. The results suggest that both expenditure and tax policies do have important effects on population levels, the composite effects depending on the extent to which expenditure is financed from domestic rates.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://taylorandfrancis.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=L71141G416335208
File Format: text/html
File Function:
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Publisher Info
Article provided by Taylor and Francis Journals in its journal Regional Studies.

Volume (Year): 16 (1982)
Issue (Month): 3 (June)
Pages: 165-170
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:16:y:1982:i:3:p:165-170

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://taylorandfrancis.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&id=104661

Order Information:
Web: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/subscription.html

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

Related research
Keywords: Local authorities Finance Population Regression model

Other versions of this item:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Goldstein, Gerald S & Moses, Leon N, 1973. "A Survey of Urban Economics," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 11(2), pages 471-515, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Schuler, Richard E, 1974. "The Interaction Between Local Government and Urban Residential Location," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 64(4), pages 682-96, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. Cuthbertson, Keith & Foreman-Peck, James & Gripaios, Peter, 1979. "Local Authority Fiscal Policy and Urban Employment," Applied Economics, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 11(4), pages 377-87, December.
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? You may want to explore EconPapers, which displays the same data as IDEAS in a different way.

This page was last updated on 2008-8-28.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.