IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/quantf/v14y2014i2p237-258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On efficiency of mean--variance based portfolio selection in defined contribution pension schemes

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Vigna

Abstract

We consider the portfolio selection problem in the accumulation phase of a defined contribution (DC) pension scheme. We solve the mean--variance portfolio selection problem using the embedding technique pioneered by Zhou and Li [ Appl. Math. Optimiz ., 2000, 42 , 19--33] and show that it is equivalent to a target-based optimization problem, consisting of the minimization of a quadratic loss function. We support the use of the target-based approach in DC pension funds for three reasons. Firstly, it transforms the difficult problem of selecting the individual's risk-aversion coefficient into the easier task of choosing an appropriate target. Secondly, it is intuitive, flexible and adaptable to the member's needs and preferences. Thirdly, it produces final portfolios that are efficient in the mean--variance setting. We address the issue of the comparison between an efficient portfolio and a portfolio that is optimal according to the more general criterion of maximization of the expected utility (EU). The two natural notions of Variance Inefficiency and Mean Inefficiency are introduced, which measure the distance of an optimal inefficient portfolio from an efficient one, focusing on their variance and on their expected value, respectively. We illustrate the general procedure for finding the mean--variance inefficiency for the HARA class of utility functions, and then focus on the popular classes of CARA and CRRA utility functions. In these cases we prove the intuitive but non-trivial result that the mean--variance inefficiency decreases with the risk aversion of the individual and increases with the time horizon and the Sharpe ratio of the risky asset. As a by-product we prove that the CARA and CRRA optimal portfolios are not mean--variance efficient. Numerical investigations stress the impact of the time horizon on extent of the mean--variance inefficiency of CARA and CRRA utility functions. While at the instantaneous level EU optimality and efficiency coincide (see Merton [ J. Econ. Theory , 1971, 3 , 373--413]), we find that, for short durations, they do not differ significantly. However, for longer durations, which are typical for pension funds, the extent of the inefficiency turns out to be remarkable and should be taken into account by pension fund investment managers seeking appropriate rules for portfolio selection. Indeed, we see this result as a fourth reason for supporting the use of the target-based approach in DC pension schemes.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Vigna, 2014. "On efficiency of mean--variance based portfolio selection in defined contribution pension schemes," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 237-258, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:quantf:v:14:y:2014:i:2:p:237-258
    DOI: 10.1080/14697688.2012.708778
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14697688.2012.708778
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14697688.2012.708778?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marina Di Giacinto & Salvatore Federico & Fausto Gozzi & Elena Vigna, 2010. "Constrained portfolio choices in the decumulation phase of a pension plan," Carlo Alberto Notebooks 155, Collegio Carlo Alberto.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Di Giacinto, Marina & Federico, Salvatore & Gozzi, Fausto & Vigna, Elena, 2014. "Income drawdown option with minimum guarantee," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(3), pages 610-624.
    2. Salvatore Federico & Paul Gassiat & Fausto Gozzi, 2015. "Utility maximization with current utility on the wealth: regularity of solutions to the HJB equation," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 415-448, April.
    3. Elena Vigna, 2009. "Mean-variance inefficiency of CRRA and CARA utility functions for portfolio selection in defined contribution pension schemes," CeRP Working Papers 89, Center for Research on Pensions and Welfare Policies, Turin (Italy).
    4. Elena Vigna, 2009. "Mean-variance inefficiency of CRRA and CARA utility functions for portfolio selection in defined contribution pension schemes," Carlo Alberto Notebooks 108, Collegio Carlo Alberto, revised 2009.
    5. Elena Vigna, 2010. "On efficiency of mean-variance based portfolio selection in DC pension schemes," Carlo Alberto Notebooks 154, Collegio Carlo Alberto, revised 2011.
    6. Dadashi, Hassan, 2020. "Optimal investment–consumption problem: Post-retirement with minimum guarantee," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 160-181.
    7. Hassan Dadashi, 2018. "Optimal investment-consumption problem: post-retirement with minimum guarantee," Papers 1803.00611, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2020.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:quantf:v:14:y:2014:i:2:p:237-258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RQUF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.