IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pubmmg/v30y2010i3p167-174.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficiency, effectiveness and efficacy: towards a framework for high-performance in healthcare commissioning

Author

Listed:
  • Helen Dickinson
  • Edward Peck
  • Joan Durose
  • Elizabeth Wade

Abstract

This article reports on research to identify the key characteristics of highperforming healthcare commissioning organizations of the future. Previous assessments have focused on efficiency and effectiveness, but have paid no attention to the role of efficacy which this research suggests is crucial. In order for healthcare organizations to become high-performing they must be able to re-construct the criteria of performance for the healthcare system deployed by the government and other key stakeholders. Although this study focuses on English healthcare organizations, this article suggests that the importance of efficacy similarly applies in other sectors and other geographical locations given the dominance of notions of performance worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Helen Dickinson & Edward Peck & Joan Durose & Elizabeth Wade, 2010. "Efficiency, effectiveness and efficacy: towards a framework for high-performance in healthcare commissioning," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 167-174, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:30:y:2010:i:3:p:167-174
    DOI: 10.1080/09540961003794311
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09540961003794311
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09540961003794311?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:30:y:2010:i:3:p:167-174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPMM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.