IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pubmgr/v7y2005i4p515-536.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding public support for the US federal bureaucracy

Author

Listed:
  • Susan Webb Yackee
  • David Lowery

Abstract

While a number of scholars have examined citizens' satisfaction with specific encounters with government agencies, few studies have assessed explanations of the public's overall evaluations of bureaucratic performance, especially accounts that address sources of variation over time. We address this gap with a new annual time series measure of aggregate assessments of the US federal bureaucracy. We find that public approval of bureaucratic performance varies markedly over time. We then test a number of prior explanations for this movement focusing on both broad contextual forces in the political environment and more specific variables more closely associated with the federal bureaucracy. While data limitations preclude developing a fully specified model tapping all of the explanations simultaneously, we are able to rule out a wide range of ‘usual suspects’ as free standing or sufficient accounts of variations in aggregate bureaucratic approval over time. But we also isolate a number of promising explanations.

Suggested Citation

  • Susan Webb Yackee & David Lowery, 2005. "Understanding public support for the US federal bureaucracy," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(4), pages 515-536, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:pubmgr:v:7:y:2005:i:4:p:515-536
    DOI: 10.1080/14719030500362389
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14719030500362389
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14719030500362389?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. B. Peters, 2010. "Bureaucracy and Democracy," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 209-222, September.
    2. Giuseppe Lucio Gaeta, 2013. "Do influential contacts help in receiving fair treatment from public officials?," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(15), pages 1407-1412, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pubmgr:v:7:y:2005:i:4:p:515-536. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPXM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.