IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pocoec/v30y2018i1p56-77.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why (not) cooperate? A cognitive model of farmers’ intention to join producer groups in Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Judith Möllers
  • Diana Traikova
  • Brînduşa Ana-Maria Bîrhală
  • Axel Wolz

Abstract

After the breakdown of the communist regime in Romania, collective farms were replaced by a large number of small-scale private farms. Although cooperation seems to be a favourable choice for these smallholders, it did not develop as perhaps expected. This article explores the factors that determine the formation of the intention of Romanian vegetable farmers to join marketing cooperatives in the form of so called producer groups. Our theoretical framework refers to Ajzen’s Theory of Planned Behaviour, which we model with a structural equation model. We identified as main intention drivers the expectation for better prices and easier access to capital. Perceived family support is another significant factor. The level of distrust is high. Although our trust variable is not significant as a predictor of the intention to cooperate in the model, we find qualitative indications that trust plays a role when the intention is translated into actual behaviour.

Suggested Citation

  • Judith Möllers & Diana Traikova & Brînduşa Ana-Maria Bîrhală & Axel Wolz, 2018. "Why (not) cooperate? A cognitive model of farmers’ intention to join producer groups in Romania," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 56-77, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:pocoec:v:30:y:2018:i:1:p:56-77
    DOI: 10.1080/14631377.2017.1361697
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14631377.2017.1361697
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14631377.2017.1361697?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wolz, Axel & Möllers, Judith & Micu, Marius Mihai, 2020. "Options for agricultural service cooperatives in a postsocialist economy: Evidence from Romania," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 49(1), pages 57-65.
    2. Jolanta Droždz & Vlada Vitunskienė & Lina Novickytė, 2021. "Profile of the Small-Scale Farms Willing to Cooperate—Evidence from Lithuania," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-21, October.
    3. Baeuml, Theresa & Möllers, Judith & Dufhues, Thomas & Wolz, Axel & Traikova, Diana, 2021. "What Motivates Commercial Small-Scale Farmers to Collaborate? Modelling the Intention to Join a Producer Organisation," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315034, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Jiri Hejkrlik & Petra Chaloupkova & Tetyana Sokolska, 2023. "The role of transformational leadership and leaders’ skills for new agricultural cooperatives in post‐soviet countries," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(1), pages 109-129, March.
    5. Samal Kaliyeva & Francisco Jose Areal & Yiorgos Gadanakis, 2020. "Attitudes of Kazakh Rural Households towards Joining and Creating Cooperatives," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.
    6. Niyazmetov, Davron & Soliev, Ilkhom & Theesfeld, Insa, 2021. "Ordered to volunteer? Institutional compatibility assessment of establishing agricultural cooperatives in Uzbekistan," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    7. Aleksandra Chlebicka & Michał Pietrzak, 2018. "Size of Membership and Survival Patterns of Producers’ Organizations in Agriculture—Social Aspects Based on Evidence from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-24, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pocoec:v:30:y:2018:i:1:p:56-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CPCE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.