Assessing Aid: A Manifesto for Aid in the 21st Century?
AbstractThe World Bank report Assessing Aid argues that aid can have positive effects on growth and infant mortality, but only when good policies are being followed by the recipient. It follows, especially since aid is fungible, and so cannot be targeted to particular uses, that donors should focus their aid on low-income countries with good policies (i.e. apply greater selectivity). This paper explores a number of weaknesses in these arguments. The growth regressions are not robust, so that different results can be obtained with relatively minor variations in model specification. In particular, the argument that aid only works when policies are right is not supported in other studies - and even the World Bank's evidence can be interpreted as saying policies work better when supported by aid inflows. The choice of which policies are good policies is also problematic, and the analysis in the report ignores the likely presence of threshold effects and other non-linearities; others would, anyhow, propose a different set of right policies, especially if the focus is poverty reduction rather than growth. The importance of fungibility may be over-stated so that donors can in fact target poverty-reduction activities, suggesting that the selectivity rules proposed in Assessing Aid are misleading. Even if the report's proposals are to be accepted it is silent on a number of important issues-such as whether to use the level or change in the index-that face the aid manager in practice.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Oxford Development Studies.
Volume (Year): 28 (2000)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.tandfonline.com/CODS20
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
This item has more than 25 citations. To prevent cluttering this page, these citations are listed on a separate page. reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.