IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/marpmg/v40y2013i4p351-366.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A study of relative efficiency between privatised and publicly operated US ports

Author

Listed:
  • Grace Wenyao Wang
  • Kris Joseph Knox
  • Paul Tae-Woo Lee

Abstract

This study identifies and compares the financial performance of privatised ports with non-privatised ports using the stochastic frontier profit function and panel data regression analysis. The goal of privatisation is to improve capital utilisation, sharpen managerial incentives and reduce bureaucratic waste. Given the arguments in favour of private ownership, the question is whether privatised ports satisfy the expectation of higher profitability. US ports are unique compared to foreign counterparts, with organisational forms ranging from purely public to landlord to private. To assess relative efficiency, we obtain data from the Public Ports Finance Survey for the period 1997 to 2006. Our findings support the argument that private sector involvement has a positive impact on port efficiency in terms of its financial performance. When price of output, capital intensity, cost of labour and size are controlled for, we see greater profit margins in landlord ports.

Suggested Citation

  • Grace Wenyao Wang & Kris Joseph Knox & Paul Tae-Woo Lee, 2013. "A study of relative efficiency between privatised and publicly operated US ports," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(4), pages 351-366, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:40:y:2013:i:4:p:351-366
    DOI: 10.1080/03088839.2013.772669
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03088839.2013.772669
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03088839.2013.772669?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Grace W.Y. Wang & Su-Han Woo & Joan Mileski, 2014. "The relative efficiency and financial risk assessment of shipping companies," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(7), pages 651-666, December.
    2. Min Wang & Huayu Li & Yung-ho Chiu & Kexin Deng & Menghua Deng, 2023. "Research on the Carbon Emission Reduction Potential of the Ports in the Yangtze River Delta of China," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    3. Zhang, Jihua, 2016. "Quasi-landlord port financing in China: Features, practice and a contract theory analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 73-88.
    4. Nicole Adler & Georg Hirte & Shravana Kumar & Hans-Martin Niemeier, 2022. "The impact of specialization, ownership, competition and regulation on efficiency: a case study of Indian seaports," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(3), pages 507-536, September.
    5. Gavilan, José M. & Ortega, Francisco J., 2020. "Productive efficiency analysis of quantitative economics journals through Stochastic Frontier Analysis using panel data || Análisis de eficiencia productiva de revistas de economía cuantitativa a trav," Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa = Journal of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, vol. 30(1), pages 297-311, December.
    6. Wang, Grace W.Y. & Pallis, Athanasios A., 2014. "Incentive approaches to overcome moral hazard in port concession agreements," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 162-174.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:40:y:2013:i:4:p:351-366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TMPM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.