IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jtrust/v2y2012i1p31-52.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organisational trust, affective commitment and bureaucratic control

Author

Listed:
  • Ian R. Gellatly
  • Michael J. Withey

Abstract

In this study, we examined the relationship between employee perceptions of organisational trust and their affective commitment. We also tested the extent to which the strength of this relation depended on the structural context. Data were provided by employees drawn from a variety of organisational settings. In addition to indicating their levels of organisational trust and affective commitment, study respondents were asked to describe their organisation's structure in terms of five bureaucratic characteristics. Consistent with our predictions, the relation between organisational trust and affective commitment was found to be more pronounced when the organisation's structure was less bureaucratic (controlling). However, there is also evidence for the paradoxical effects of bureaucracy as both enabling and disabling at the same time. We discuss the theoretical implications of these findings, and consider whether bureaucracy is an enabling, disabling, or enabling-and-disabling organisational form.

Suggested Citation

  • Ian R. Gellatly & Michael J. Withey, 2012. "Organisational trust, affective commitment and bureaucratic control," Journal of Trust Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 31-52, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jtrust:v:2:y:2012:i:1:p:31-52
    DOI: 10.1080/21515581.2012.659936
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21515581.2012.659936
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21515581.2012.659936?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pfeffer, Jeffrey, 1997. "New Directions for Organization Theory: Problems and Prospects," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195114348, Decembrie.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robert D. Costigan & Richard Insinga & J. Jason Berman & Grazyna Kranas & Vladimir A. Kureshov, 2013. "The significance of direct-leader and co-worker trust on turnover intentions: A cross-cultural study," Journal of Trust Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 98-124, October.
    2. Peter Ping Li, 2017. "The time for transition: Future trust research," Journal of Trust Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1-14, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Dobers & Lars Strannegård & Rolf Wolff, 2000. "Union‐Jacking the research agenda. A study of the frontstage and backstage of Business Strategy and the Environment 1992–1998," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(1), pages 49-61, January.
    2. Scherhag, Christian & Boenigk, Silke, 2010. "Relationship Fundraising: Stand der empirischen Forschung, theoretischer Bezugsrahmen und zukünftige Forschungsfelder," ZögU - Zeitschrift für öffentliche und gemeinwirtschaftliche Unternehmen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 33(4), pages 354-367.
    3. Y. Sekou Bermiss & Benjamin L. Hallen & Rory McDonald & Emily C. Pahnke, 2017. "Entrepreneurial beacons: The Yale endowment, run‐ups, and the growth of venture capital," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 545-565, March.
    4. Sarah Lister, 2000. "Power in partnership? An analysis of an NGO's relationships with its partners," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(2), pages 227-239.
    5. Ahmet Ilhan, 2020. "Comparison of Organizational Theory in the Axis of the "Pandemonium" Metaphor in Modern, Symbolic and Postmodern Approaches," Eurasian Journal of Business and Management, Eurasian Publications, vol. 8(4), pages 292-304.
    6. Youngcheoul Kang & Nakbum Choi & Seoyong Kim, 2021. "Searching for New Model of Digital Informatics for Human–Computer Interaction: Testing the Institution-Based Technology Acceptance Model (ITAM)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-36, May.
    7. Belyaeva Zh S., 2011. "Transformation processes of the corporate development in Russia : corporate social responsibility," Экономика региона, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение науки «Институт экономики Уральского отделения Российской академии наук», issue 1, pages 142-142.
    8. Ferraro, Fabrizio & Pfeffer, Jeffrey & Sutton, Robert I., 2003. "Economics language and assumptions: How theories can become self-fulfilling," IESE Research Papers D/530, IESE Business School.
    9. Pornsit Jiraporn & Yixin Liu & Young S. Kim, 2014. "How Do Powerful CEOs Affect Analyst Coverage?," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 20(3), pages 652-676, June.
    10. Boone, C.A.J.J. & van Witteloostuijn, A. & van Olffen, W. & de Brabander, B., 2003. "The Genesis of top management team diversity : selective turnover among top management teams in the Dutch newspaper publisher industry (1970-1994)," Research Memorandum 006, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    11. Hemlin, Sven, 2002. "Creative Knowledge Environments in the Innovation System," Working Papers 7/2002, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Management, Politics & Philosophy.
    12. Liu, Zuoming, 2020. "Unraveling the complex relationship between environmental and financial performance ─── A multilevel longitudinal analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 328-340.
    13. Alessandro Lomi & Philippa Pattison, 2006. "Manufacturing Relations: An Empirical Study of the Organization of Production Across Multiple Networks," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 313-332, June.
    14. Jerker Denrell, 2000. "Radical Organization Theory," Rationality and Society, , vol. 12(1), pages 39-66, February.
    15. John P. Moriarty, 2010. "Have Structural Issues Placed New Zealand's Hospitality Industry beyond Price?," Tourism Economics, , vol. 16(3), pages 695-713, September.
    16. Mehmet Nasih TAĞ & Duygu HIDIROĞLU, 2018. "Kaymakamların Algılanan Liderlik Tarzı Çalışanların İş Tatminini Etkiliyor mu? Ampirik Bir Çalışma," Istanbul Business Research, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 47(2), pages 233-258, November.
    17. Misty L. Loughry & Henry L. Tosi, 2008. "Performance Implications of Peer Monitoring," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(6), pages 876-890, December.
    18. Hideshi Itoh, 2004. "Moral Hazard and Other‐Regarding Preferences," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 55(1), pages 18-45, March.
    19. Bora Coşar & Hakan Yilmaz & Erkut Altindağ, 2019. "The Role of State‐Owned Enterprises in an Artificial Monopoly Market: The Case of Turkey," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 78(5), pages 1171-1199, November.
    20. Fujiao Xie & Ying Guo & Shirley J. Daniel & Yuanyang Liu, 2024. "The dynamic relation between board gender diversity and firm performance: the moderating role of shareholder activism," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 62(1), pages 225-246, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jtrust:v:2:y:2012:i:1:p:31-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJTR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.