IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jnlasa/v108y2013i503p789-800.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sensitivity Analysis of Per-Protocol Time-to-Event Treatment Efficacy in Randomized Clinical Trials

Author

Listed:
  • Peter B. Gilbert
  • Bryan E. Shepherd
  • Michael G. Hudgens

Abstract

Assessing per-protocol (PP) treatment efficacy on a time-to-event endpoint is a common objective of randomized clinical trials. The typical analysis uses the same method employed for the intention-to-treat analysis (e.g., standard survival analysis) applied to the subgroup meeting protocol adherence criteria. However, due to potential post-randomization selection bias, this analysis may mislead about treatment efficacy. Moreover, while there is extensive literature on methods for assessing causal treatment effects in compliers, these methods do not apply to a common class of trials where (a) the primary objective compares survival curves, (b) it is inconceivable to assign participants to be adherent and event free before adherence is measured, and (c) the exclusion restriction assumption fails to hold. HIV vaccine efficacy trials including the recent RV144 trial exemplify this class, because many primary endpoints (e.g., HIV infections) occur before adherence is measured, and nonadherent subjects who receive some of the planned immunizations may be partially protected. Therefore, we develop methods for assessing PP treatment efficacy for this problem class, considering three causal estimands of interest. Because these estimands are not identifiable from the observable data, we develop nonparametric bounds and semiparametric sensitivity analysis methods that yield estimated ignorance and uncertainty intervals. The methods are applied to RV144. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter B. Gilbert & Bryan E. Shepherd & Michael G. Hudgens, 2013. "Sensitivity Analysis of Per-Protocol Time-to-Event Treatment Efficacy in Randomized Clinical Trials," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 108(503), pages 789-800, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:108:y:2013:i:503:p:789-800
    DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2013.786649
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01621459.2013.786649
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01621459.2013.786649?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shepherd, Bryan E. & Gilbert, Peter B. & Lumley, Thomas, 2007. "Sensitivity Analyses Comparing Time-to-Event Outcomes Existing Only in a Subset Selected Postrandomization," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 102, pages 573-582, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dean Follmann & Chiung-Yu Huang, 2015. "Incorporating founder virus information in vaccine field trials," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(2), pages 386-396, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. VanderWeele Tyler J, 2011. "Principal Stratification -- Uses and Limitations," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Bryan E. Shepherd & Peter B. Gilbert & Charles T. Dupont, 2011. "Sensitivity Analyses Comparing Time-to-Event Outcomes Only Existing in a Subset Selected Postrandomization and Relaxing Monotonicity," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(3), pages 1100-1110, September.
    3. Brian L. Egleston & Robert G. Uzzo & Yu-Ning Wong, 2017. "Latent Class Survival Models Linked by Principal Stratification to Investigate Heterogenous Survival Subgroups Among Individuals With Early-Stage Kidney Cancer," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(518), pages 534-546, April.
    4. Sjolander Arvid & Vansteelandt Stijn & Humphreys Keith, 2010. "A Principal Stratification Approach to Assess the Differences in Prognosis between Cancers Caused by Hormone Replacement Therapy and by Other Factors," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 1-37, June.
    5. VanderWeele, Tyler J., 2008. "Simple relations between principal stratification and direct and indirect effects," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(17), pages 2957-2962, December.
    6. German Blanco & Xuan Chen & Carlos A. Flores & Alfonso Flores-Lagunes, 2020. "Bounds on Average and Quantile Treatment Effects on Duration Outcomes Under Censoring, Selection, and Noncompliance," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(4), pages 901-920, October.
    7. Dean Follmann & Chiung-Yu Huang, 2015. "Incorporating founder virus information in vaccine field trials," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(2), pages 386-396, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:108:y:2013:i:503:p:789-800. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UASA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.