Testing for Trend in the Presence of Autoregressive Error: A Comment
AbstractRoy, Falk and Fuller (2004) presented a procedure aimed at providing a test for the value of the slope of a trend function that has (nearly) controlled size in autoregressive models whether the noise component is stationary or has a unit root. In this note, we document errors in both their theoretical results and the simulations they reported. Once these are corrected for, their procedure delivers a test that has very liberal size in the case with a unit root so that the stated goal is not achieved. Interestingly, the mistakes in the code used to generate the simulated results (which is the basis for the evidence about the reliability of the method) are such that what they report is essentially equivalent to the size and power of the test proposed by Perron and Yabu (2009), which was shown to have the standard Normal distribution whether the noise is stationary or has a unit root.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Journal of the American Statistical Association.
Volume (Year): 107 (2012)
Issue (Month): 498 (June)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.tandfonline.com/UASA20
Other versions of this item:
- Pierre Perron & Tomoyoshi Yabu, 2011. "Testing for Trend in the Presence of Autoregressive Error: A Comment," Keio/Kyoto Joint Global COE Discussion Paper Series 2011-024, Keio/Kyoto Joint Global COE Program.
- Pierre Perron & Tomoyoshi Yabu, 2011. "Testing for Trend in the Presence of Autoregressive Error: A Comment," Boston University - Department of Economics - Working Papers Series WP2011-052, Boston University - Department of Economics.
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Pierre Perron & Tomoyoshi Yabu, 2005.
"Estimating Deterministric Trends with an Integrated or Stationary Noise Component,"
Boston University - Department of Economics - Working Papers Series
WP2005-037, Boston University - Department of Economics.
- Perron, Pierre & Yabu, Tomoyoshi, 2009. "Estimating deterministic trends with an integrated or stationary noise component," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 151(1), pages 56-69, July.
- Pierre Perron & Tomoyoshi Yabu, 2007. "Estimating Deterministic Trend with an Integrated or Stationary Noise Component," Boston University - Department of Economics - Working Papers Series WP2007-020, Boston University - Department of Economics.
- Pierre Perron & Tomoyoshi Yabu, . "Estimating Deterministic Trends with an Integrated or Stationary Noise Component," Boston University - Department of Economics - Working Papers Series WP2006-012, Boston University - Department of Economics, revised Feb 2006.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.