Temporary social dumping, union legalisation and FDI: a note on the strategic use of standards
AbstractThis paper analyses the welfare implications for a developing country of using union legalisation as a policy instrument to attract inward foreign direct investment. While its presence may discourage a foreign multinational (MNE) from locating in the host country, unionisation is an important rent-extracting instrument for the host country. We show that if the MNE benefits from dynamic effects, the host country government may have an incentive to adopt temporary social dumping: banning the union in the short run to extract higher rents in the future. However, if the government can use a fiscal instrument in conjunction with union legalisation, the former can circumvent the need to engage in social dumping.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development.
Volume (Year): 9 (2001)
Issue (Month): 3 ()
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJTE20
Other versions of this item:
- Dermot Leahy & Catia Montagna, . "Temporary Social Dumping, Union Legalisation and FDI: A Note on the Strategic Use of Standards," EPRU Working Paper Series 99-08, Economic Policy Research Unit (EPRU), University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.
- Leahy, D., 2000. "Temporary Social Dumping, Union Legalisation and FDI: a Note on the Strategic Use of Standards," Papers 00/2, College Dublin, Department of Political Economy-.
- F16 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade and Labor Market Interactions
- F23 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - Multinational Firms; International Business
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Dewit, Gerda & Görg, Holger & Montagna, Catia, 2003.
"Should I Stay or Should I Go? A Note on Employment Protection, Domestic Anchorage, and FDI,"
IZA Discussion Papers
845, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
- Gerda Dewit & Holger Gorg & Catia Montagna, 2003. "Should I Stay or Should I Go? A Note on Employment Protection, Domestic Anchorage and FDI," Dundee Discussion Papers in Economics 145, Economic Studies, University of Dundee.
- Dewit, G. & Holger, G. & Montagna, C., 2003. "Should I stay or should I go? A note on employment protection, domestic anchorage, and FDI," Economics, Finance and Accounting Department Working Paper Series n1291003, Department of Economics, Finance and Accounting, National University of Ireland - Maynooth.
- Dermot Leahy & Catia Montagna, 2005. "Union legislation and export platform FDI," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 437-452.
- Dermot Leahy & Catia Montagna, 2005. "Union Bargaining Power, Social Dumping, and Foreign Direct Investment," International Trade 0510001, EconWPA.
- Gerda Dewit & Holger Görg & Catia Montagna, 2009. "Should I stay or should I go? Foreign direct investment, employment protection and domestic anchorage," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer, vol. 145(1), pages 93-110, April.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.