IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jhudca/v4y2003i1p5-27.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Civil Society and Accountability

Author

Listed:
  • Mary Kaldor

Abstract

This paper addresses the question of whether trust in civil society groups is justified when it comes to giving voice to the poor. It addresses the issue of accountability as it relates to civil society, defining "moral' accountability as an organization's accountability towards the people it was established to help, and procedural accountability as internal management. It draws a distinction between civil society and non-governmental organizations, and argues that the contradiction between "moral' and "procedural' accountability applies primarily to non-governmental organizations, a subset of civil society. Beginning with an overview of the concept of civil society and the relevance of voice, it develops a typology of civil society actors to clarify different forms of accountability, and concludes with policy recommendations.

Suggested Citation

  • Mary Kaldor, 2003. "Civil Society and Accountability," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 5-27.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jhudca:v:4:y:2003:i:1:p:5-27
    DOI: 10.1080/1464988032000051469
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1464988032000051469
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1464988032000051469?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel Arenas & Pablo Sanchez & Matthew Murphy, 2013. "Different Paths to Collaboration Between Businesses and Civil Society and the Role of Third Parties," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 115(4), pages 723-739, July.
    2. Said, Jamaliah & Alam, Md. Mahmudul & bin Abd Aziz, Mohamad Azizal, 2019. "Public Accountability System: Empirical Assessment of Public Sector of Malaysia," SocArXiv x5dtf, Center for Open Science.
    3. Cecilia Tortajada, 2016. "Nongovernmental Organizations and Influence on Global Public Policy," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 3(2), pages 266-274, May.
    4. Roger C. Riddell, 2013. "Assessing the Overall Impact of Civil Society on Development at the Country Level: An Exploratory Approach," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 31(4), pages 371-396, July.
    5. Carole-Anne Sénit & Frank Biermann & Agni Kalfagianni, 2017. "The Representativeness of Global Deliberation: A Critical Assessment of Civil Society Consultations for Sustainable Development," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(1), pages 62-72, February.
    6. Willem Elbers & Lau Schulpen & Emma Frobisher, 2022. "Stuck in a “Catch-22”: Why Donors Fail to Include Grassroots Perspectives on CSO Legitimacy," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(2), pages 921-939, April.
    7. Voss, Kim & Williams, Michelle, 2009. "The Local in the Global: Rethinking Social Movements in the New Millennium," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt1c64s44f, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.
    8. Carole‐Anne Sénit & Frank Biermann, 2021. "In Whose Name Are You Speaking? The Marginalization of the Poor in Global Civil Society," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(5), pages 581-591, November.
    9. Rob Dixon & John Ritchie & Juliana Siwale, 2006. "Microfinance: accountability from the grassroots," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 19(3), pages 405-427, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jhudca:v:4:y:2003:i:1:p:5-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJHD20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.