This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Further thoughts on clarifying the idea of dissent: The Russian and Soviet experience

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Vincent Barnett

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://taylorandfrancis.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=M268J4144705J47N
File Format: text/html
File Function:
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Publisher Info
Article provided by Taylor and Francis Journals in its journal Journal of the History of Economic Thought.

Volume (Year): 28 (2006)
Issue (Month): 1 (March)
Pages: 111-118
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:taf:jhisec:v:28:y:2006:i:1:p:111-118

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://taylorandfrancis.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&id=104632

Order Information:
Web: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/subscription.html

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

Related research
Keywords:

Other versions of this item:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Roger Backhouse, 2004. "A Suggestion for Clarifying the Study of Dissent in Economics," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 261-271, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Vincent Barnett, 2004. "E. E. Slutsky: Mathematical Statistician, Economist, and Political Economist?," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 5-18, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full references

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Roger Backhouse, 2006. "The social context of dissent: a response to Barnett and Samuels," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 125-126, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Over 800 institutions contribute their bibliographic data directly to this service.

This page was last updated on 2008-8-3.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.