IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v57y2014i1p123-143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Detailed vs. fuzzy information in non-market valuation studies: the role of familiarity

Author

Listed:
  • Linus Hasselstr�m
  • Cecilia H�kansson

Abstract

We apply a split-sample contingent valuation survey to test whether the level of ecological information affects the willingness to pay (WTP) and valuation uncertainty for improved water quality. For respondents who are unfamiliar with water quality problems, the WTP is significantly different between the sample that received detailed ecological information and the sample that received fuzzy information. This study also provides new empirical evidence for the counterfactual; in a situation with high familiarity, more information does not affect mean WTP. The main recommendation to future valuation practice is to provide detailed ecological information in the case when many respondents are unfamiliar with the good. The level of information did not influence valuation uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Linus Hasselstr�m & Cecilia H�kansson, 2014. "Detailed vs. fuzzy information in non-market valuation studies: the role of familiarity," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(1), pages 123-143, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:57:y:2014:i:1:p:123-143
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2012.736370
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2012.736370
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2012.736370?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:57:y:2014:i:1:p:123-143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.