IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jecmet/v7y2001i3p373-394.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Classical Utilitarianism and the methodology of determinate choice, in economics and in ethics

Author

Listed:
  • Tom Warke

Abstract

This paper argues that modern economic theory is essentially utilitarian with one significant exception: its abandonment of a multi-dimensional conception of utility. The paper reviews three alternative methods by which utility can be portrayed as a one-dimensional, hence determinate, index of desire, while suggesting that none of them can command empirical support. A second theme of the paper is that classical utilitarianism, by denying the ontological existence of intrinsic worth, implies the coincidence of economic and ethical aggregate optimality: those choices that maximize the self-perceived happiness of rational agents are also the right choices. Non-utilitarian ethics, by contrast, attains determinate optima by means of an a priori designation of intrinsic worth. It is argued that most philosophers, following G. E. Moore, have missed the true issue that divides utilitarian and non-utilitarian ethics, for they have presumed that all ethical systems presuppose intrinsic worth.

Suggested Citation

  • Tom Warke, 2001. "Classical Utilitarianism and the methodology of determinate choice, in economics and in ethics," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(3), pages 373-394.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jecmet:v:7:y:2001:i:3:p:373-394
    DOI: 10.1080/135017800453742
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/135017800453742
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/135017800453742?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jecmet:v:7:y:2001:i:3:p:373-394. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.