This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

On the Use and Nonuse of Surveys in Economics

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Boulier, Bryan L
Goldfarb, Robert S

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

While it is widely alleged that economists do not like or use questionnaire surveys, the facts are considerably more complicated. Economists make extensive use of survey information on such things as prices and employment, and the use of 'contingent valuation' surveys has exploded recently. The paper reviews the historical debate that led to economists' seeming distrust of surveys. It then investigates why there is extensive use of surveys in the face of methodological strictures against survey use. To do this, the paper develops a typology of kinds of information that can be gathered by surveys and considers whether anti-survey arguments apply with equal force to the various categories. Differing methodological uses for survey data are then considered, using a number of actual survey literatures as illustrations. Finally, the paper presents strategies for improving the use of survey data in economics. Copyright 1998 by Taylor and Francis Group

Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Publisher Info
Article provided by Taylor and Francis Journals in its journal Journal of Economic Methodology.

Volume (Year): 5 (1998)
Issue (Month): 1 (June)
Pages: 1-21
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:taf:jecmet:v:5:y:1998:i:1:p:1-21

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://taylorandfrancis.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&id=104715

Order Information:
Web: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/subscription.html

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

Related research
Keywords:

Other versions of this item:

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
  1. Mayer, Thomas, 2004. "The Influence of Friedman's Methodological Essay," Working Papers 04-1, University of California at Davis, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
  2. Robert S. Goldfarb, Thomas C. Leonard, Steven M. Suranovic, 2001. "Are rival theories of smoking underdetermined?," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 229-251, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. John H. Finch, 2002. "The role of grounded theory in developing economic theory," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 213-234, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  4. Scott R. Steele, 2008. "Web-based Surveys Facilitate Undergraduate Research and Knowledge," Journal of Economic Education, Helen Dwight Reid Foundation, vol. 39(1), pages 41-49. [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? It is the publishers that input data about their publications, as there is no staff at RePEc.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-14.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.