IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jdevst/v50y2014i4p570-582.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Debating Capitalist Dynamics and Unfree Labour: A Missing Link?

Author

Listed:
  • Tom Brass

Abstract

Examined here are recent contributions to an important and longstanding debate in political economy, about the link between capitalist development and the employment of unfree labour. These contributions maintain that, because Marxist theory failed to understand the centrality of unfreedom to modern capitalism, a new explanation of this link is needed. However, it is argued here that many of these new characteristics are in fact no different from those identified earlier by Marxist theory. The exclusion of the latter approach from the debate is thus unwarranted.

Suggested Citation

  • Tom Brass, 2014. "Debating Capitalist Dynamics and Unfree Labour: A Missing Link?," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(4), pages 570-582, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jdevst:v:50:y:2014:i:4:p:570-582
    DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2013.872775
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00220388.2013.872775
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00220388.2013.872775?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Terence J. Byres, 1996. "Capitalism from Above and Capitalism from Below," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-349-25117-9, June.
    2. repec:ilo:ilowps:375174 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Bedoy Garland, Eduardo. & Bedoya Silva-Santisteban, 2005. "El trabajo forzoso en la extracción de la madera en la Amazonía Peruana," ILO Working Papers 993751743402676, International Labour Organization.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sai Balakrishnan, 2019. "Recombinant Urbanization: Agrarian–urban Landed Property and Uneven Development in India," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 617-632, July.
    2. repec:ilo:ilowps:376750 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Kumar, Awanish, 2017. "Agrarian Questions: Old and New," Review of Agrarian Studies, Foundation for Agrarian Studies, vol. 7(1), July.
    4. Jonathan Conning, 2004. "The Causes of Slavery or Serfdom and the Roads to Agrarian Capitalism: Domar's Hypothesis Revisited," Economics Working Paper Archive at Hunter College 401, Hunter College Department of Economics.
    5. Christine Trampusch & Dennis C. Spies, 2014. "Agricultural Interests and the Origins of Capitalism: A Parallel Comparative History of Germany, Denmark, New Zealand, and the USA," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(6), pages 918-942, December.
    6. Arindam Banerjee, 2023. "Agrarian Questions: New Paradigms in a Changing World," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 54(3), pages 671-687, May.
    7. Barbara Harriss-White, Deepak K Mishra, Vandana Upadhyay, "undated". "Institutional Diversity and Capitalist Transformation in Rural Arunachal Pradesh," QEH Working Papers qehwps179, Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.
    8. Nicholas Babin, 2019. "The Agrarian Question and Coffee in Costa Rica," Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, Centre for Agrarian Research and Education for South, vol. 8(3), pages 323-348, December.
    9. Correa Romar & Rao D. Tripati, 2014. "A Heterodox Economics Critique of Financial Liberalization," Journal of Heterodox Economics, Sciendo, vol. 1(1), pages 79-99, June.
    10. Diana Suhardiman & Mark Giordano & Lilao Leebouapao & Oulavanh Keovilignavong, 2016. "Farmers’ strategies as building block for rethinking sustainable intensification," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 33(3), pages 563-574, September.
    11. Belser, Patrick., 2005. "Forced labour and human trafficking : estimating the profits," ILO Working Papers 993767503402676, International Labour Organization.
    12. Swarnabh Ghosh & Ayan Meer, 2021. "Extended urbanisation and the agrarian question: Convergences, divergences and openings," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(6), pages 1097-1119, May.
    13. Freedom Mazwi & Rangarirai G. Muchetu & George T. Mudimu, 2021. "Revisiting the Trimodal Agrarian Structure as a Social Differentiation Analysis Framework in Zimbabwe: A Study," Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, Centre for Agrarian Research and Education for South, vol. 10(2), pages 318-343, August.
    14. Deng, Kent & O'Brien, Patrick, 2014. "Clarifying data for reciprocal comparisons of nutritional standards of living in England and the Yangtze Delta (Jiangnan), c.1644 – c.1840," Economic History Working Papers 59303, London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Economic History.
    15. Lucia da Corta (QEH), "undated". "The Political Economy of Agrarian Change: Dinosaur or Phoenix?," QEH Working Papers qehwps174, Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.
    16. Jonathan Conning & Michael Kevane, 2005. "Freedom, Servitude and Voluntary Contract," Economics Working Paper Archive at Hunter College 408, Hunter College Department of Economics.
    17. Michael Gizicki-Neundlinger & And Dino Güldner, 2017. "Surplus, Scarcity and Soil Fertility in Pre-Industrial Austrian Agriculture—The Sustainability Costs of Inequality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-18, February.
    18. Akram-Lodhi, A.H., 2001. "Landlords are taking back the land: the agrarian transition in Vietnam," ISS Working Papers - General Series 19098, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jdevst:v:50:y:2014:i:4:p:570-582. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FJDS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.