IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/japsta/v40y2013i12p2564-2578.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new variable selection method for uniform designs

Author

Listed:
  • E. Androulakis
  • C. Koukouvinos

Abstract

As an important class of space-filling designs, uniform designs (UDs) choose a set of points over a certain domain such that these points are uniformly scattered, under a specific discrepancy measure. They have been applied successfully in many industrial and scientific experiments since they appeared in 1980. A noteworthy and practical advantage is their ability to investigate a large number of high-level factors simultaneously with a fairly economical set of experimental runs. As a result, UDs can be properly used as experimental plans that are intended to derive the significant factors from a list of many potential ones. To this end, a new screening procedure is introduced via penalized least squares. A simulation study is conducted to support the proposed method, which reveals that it can be considered quite promising and expedient, as judged in terms of Type I and Type II error rates.

Suggested Citation

  • E. Androulakis & C. Koukouvinos, 2013. "A new variable selection method for uniform designs," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(12), pages 2564-2578, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:40:y:2013:i:12:p:2564-2578
    DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2013.819568
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02664763.2013.819568
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02664763.2013.819568?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Winker, Peter & Fang, Kai-Tai, 1995. "Application of threshold accepting to the evaluation of the discrepancy of a set of points," Discussion Papers, Series II 248, University of Konstanz, Collaborative Research Centre (SFB) 178 "Internationalization of the Economy".
    2. Hickernell, Fred J., 1999. "Goodness-of-fit statistics, discrepancies and robust designs," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 73-78, August.
    3. Gareth M. James & Peter Radchenko & Jinchi Lv, 2009. "DASSO: connections between the Dantzig selector and lasso," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(1), pages 127-142, January.
    4. Fan J. & Li R., 2001. "Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 1348-1360, December.
    5. A. Antoniadis, 1997. "Wavelets in statistics: A review," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 6(2), pages 97-130, August.
    6. Fred J. Hickernell, 2002. "Uniform designs limit aliasing," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 89(4), pages 893-904, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emmanouil Androulakis & Christos Koukouvinos & Kalliopi Mylona & Filia Vonta, 2010. "A real survival analysis application via variable selection methods for Cox's proportional hazards model," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(8), pages 1399-1406.
    2. Canhong Wen & Xueqin Wang & Shaoli Wang, 2015. "Laplace Error Penalty-based Variable Selection in High Dimension," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 42(3), pages 685-700, September.
    3. A. Karagrigoriou & C. Koukouvinos & K. Mylona, 2010. "On the advantages of the non-concave penalized likelihood model selection method with minimum prediction errors in large-scale medical studies," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 13-24.
    4. Xingwei Tong & Xin He & Liuquan Sun & Jianguo Sun, 2009. "Variable Selection for Panel Count Data via Non‐Concave Penalized Estimating Function," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 36(4), pages 620-635, December.
    5. E. Androulakis & C. Koukouvinos & F. Vonta, 2014. "Tuning parameter selection in penalized generalized linear models for discrete data," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 68(4), pages 276-292, November.
    6. Ertefaie Ashkan & Asgharian Masoud & Stephens David A., 2018. "Variable Selection in Causal Inference using a Simultaneous Penalization Method," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 1-16, March.
    7. Jianqing Fan & Jinchi Lv, 2010. "Comments on: ℓ 1 -penalization for mixture regression models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 19(2), pages 264-269, August.
    8. Christis Katsouris, 2023. "High Dimensional Time Series Regression Models: Applications to Statistical Learning Methods," Papers 2308.16192, arXiv.org.
    9. Liu-Cang Wu & Zhong-Zhan Zhang & Deng-Ke Xu, 2012. "Variable selection in joint mean and variance models of Box--Cox transformation," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(12), pages 2543-2555, August.
    10. Chalise, Prabhakar & Fridley, Brooke L., 2012. "Comparison of penalty functions for sparse canonical correlation analysis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 245-254.
    11. Chun-Wei Zheng & Zong-Feng Qi & Qiao-Zhen Zhang & Min-Qian Liu, 2022. "A Method for Augmenting Supersaturated Designs with Newly Added Factors," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Yong-Dao Zhou & Kai-Tai Fang, 2013. "An efficient method for constructing uniform designs with large size," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 1319-1331, June.
    13. Luigi Augugliaro & Angelo M. Mineo & Ernst C. Wit, 2013. "Differential geometric least angle regression: a differential geometric approach to sparse generalized linear models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 75(3), pages 471-498, June.
    14. Diego Vidaurre & Concha Bielza & Pedro Larrañaga, 2013. "A Survey of L1 Regression," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 81(3), pages 361-387, December.
    15. Abhik Ghosh & Magne Thoresen, 2018. "Non-concave penalization in linear mixed-effect models and regularized selection of fixed effects," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 102(2), pages 179-210, April.
    16. Gerda Claeskens, 2012. "Focused estimation and model averaging with penalization methods: an overview," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 66(3), pages 272-287, August.
    17. Zhang, Jing & Wang, Qin & Mays, D'Arcy, 2021. "Robust MAVE through nonconvex penalized regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    18. Gao, Yan & Zhang, Xinyu & Wang, Shouyang & Zou, Guohua, 2016. "Model averaging based on leave-subject-out cross-validation," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 192(1), pages 139-151.
    19. Howard D. Bondell & Brian J. Reich, 2012. "Consistent High-Dimensional Bayesian Variable Selection via Penalized Credible Regions," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(500), pages 1610-1624, December.
    20. Liucang Wu & Huiqiong Li, 2012. "Variable selection for joint mean and dispersion models of the inverse Gaussian distribution," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 75(6), pages 795-808, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:40:y:2013:i:12:p:2564-2578. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.