IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/irapec/v17y2003i2p209-221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does the Ricardian Equivalence Proposition Hold in Less Developed Countries?

Author

Listed:
  • Gianluigi Giorgioni
  • Ken Holden

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to assess whether the Ricardian Equivalence Proposition (REP) holds in developing countries. Prima facie, since the REP requires a number of assumptions that might not appear to be satisfied in developing countries, it seems that the REP should not hold. However, the empirical evidence provided so far is mixed. In this paper, the validity of the REP will be tested using panel data for ten developing countries: Burundi, El Salvador, Ethiopia, Honduras, India, Morocco, Nigeria, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Zimbabw1e. The countries were chosen for the availability of data and should reflect the various circumstances of low-income countries. Despite the obvious limitation of the data available and the diversity of the countries, the results provide some tentative support for the REP for developing countries, at least warranting further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Gianluigi Giorgioni & Ken Holden, 2003. "Does the Ricardian Equivalence Proposition Hold in Less Developed Countries?," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 209-221.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:irapec:v:17:y:2003:i:2:p:209-221
    DOI: 10.1080/0269217032000064062
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0269217032000064062
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0269217032000064062?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ian P. Cassar & Kurt Davison & Christian Xuereb, 2018. "Does the Ricardian Equivalence Theorem Capture the Consumption Behavior of Maltese Households?," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(12), pages 1-77, December.
    2. Francesco Forte & Cosimo Magazzino, 2015. "Ricardian equivalence and twin deficits hypotheses in the euro area," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 17(2), pages 148-166, October.
    3. Achua, Joseph Kwaghkor & Yusuf, Mariam & Wakdok, Samuel Stephen, 2022. "Nonlinear public debt and resource rent nexus in highly indebted resource-rich sub-Saharan economies: Evidence from Nigeria," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    4. Yaya Keho, 2016. "Impact of Budget Deficit on Private Consumption inWAEMU Countries: Evidence from Pooled Mean Group Estimation," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(3), pages 189-195, March.
    5. Francesco Forte & Cosimo Magazzino, 2013. "Twin Deficits in the European Countries," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 19(3), pages 289-310, August.
    6. SazanTaher Saeed & Dr. Hatem HatefAbdulkadhimAltaee, 2017. "Export and Economic Growth Nexus in the GCC Countries: A panel Data Approach," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 7(12), pages 1-9, December.
    7. Mumtaz, Kinza & Munir, Kashif, 2016. "Dynamics of Twin Deficits in South Asian Countries," MPRA Paper 74592, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Elham Pourmokhtar & Reza Moghaddasi & Amir Mohammad Nejad & Seyed Safdar Hosseini, 2018. "Meat demand model in Iran: a restricted source-differentiated almost ideal demand system approach," Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, Universitas Islam Indonesia, vol. 10(2), pages 194-204, Oktober.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:irapec:v:17:y:2003:i:2:p:209-221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CIRA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.