Review of Peter Bossaerts, The Paradox of Asset Pricing
Abstract
By 'the paradox of asset pricing' Peter Bossaerts refers to his contention that, despite its apparent generality and sophistication, the theory of finance has largely been a failure empirically. Bossaerts reviews the major areas of finance: theory, empirical methods, empirical results and experiments. The explanatory variables for average asset returns suggested by theory - market beta and consumption beta - predict returns less successfully than variables for which the theoretical basis is weak. This reviewer agrees with Bossaerts' assessment. Bossaerts proposes weakening the hypothesis of market efficiency from full rational expectations to efficient learning: agents update priors optimally - that is, according to Bayes' rule - but start with possibly biased priors. He develops ingenious empirical implications of this specification. For example, he shows that under efficient learning, inverse asset returns are fair games going backward in time (under some additional assumptions). Empirical implementation of these tests appear promising.Download Info
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic Info
Article provided by Taylor and Francis Journals in its journal International Journal of the Economics of Business.
Volume (Year): 10 (2003)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Pages: 117-126
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://taylorandfrancis.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&id=101205
Order Information:
Web: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/subscription.asp
Related research
Keywords: Market Efficiency; Martingales; Experiments; CAPM; Consumption-based Asset Pricing;References
No references listed on IDEASYou can help add them by filling out this form.
Citations
Lists
This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ijecbs:v:10:y:2003:i:1:p:117-126For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.