IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/fosoec/v36y2007i1p53-62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Can US Schools Desegregate After the End of Busing?

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick Welch

Abstract

The end of busing of primary and secondary school students has been a major setback for integration of public schools in the USA. The purpose of this paper is not to offer an alternative to busing; regrettably, no obvious alternative stands out. Rather, it is to offer some social, legal and economic background to help the reader consider, and perhaps propose, realistic alternatives that would reduce both racial and economic segregation in our schools and society. The paper is divided into three sections. The first offers background information useful for better understanding and evaluating the end of busing and school resegregation. The second section focuses on an important parallel between racial and economic discrimination. The closing section introduces considerations important for anticipating reactions to, and the costs and benefits of, alternatives to busing for reintegrating schools, as well as several recommendations to which those considerations can be applied.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick Welch, 2007. "How Can US Schools Desegregate After the End of Busing?," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 53-62, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:fosoec:v:36:y:2007:i:1:p:53-62
    DOI: 10.1007/s12143-007-0006-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s12143-007-0006-y
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12143-007-0006-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sears, David O. & Hensler, Carl P. & Speer, Leslie K., 1979. "Whites' Opposition to “Busing†: Self-interest or Symbolic Politics?," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 73(2), pages 369-384, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jason Barabas, 1998. "Wage Erosion, Economic Assessments, and Social Welfare Opinions," JCPR Working Papers 56, Northwestern University/University of Chicago Joint Center for Poverty Research.
    2. Cochran, John K. & Chamlin, Mitchell B., 2006. "The enduring racial divide in death penalty support," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 85-99.
    3. Micheal W. Giles & Arthur Evans, 1986. "The Power Approach to Intergroup Hostility," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 30(3), pages 469-486, September.
    4. Ashley D. Ross & Stella M. Rouse, 2015. "Economic Uncertainty, Job Threat, and the Resiliency of the Millennial Generation's Attitudes Toward Immigration," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 96(5), pages 1363-1379, November.
    5. Cardell K. Jacobson, 1985. "Resistance to Affirmative Action," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 29(2), pages 306-329, June.
    6. Matthew J. Burbank & Daniel Levin, 2015. "Community Attachment and Voting for School Vouchers," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 96(5), pages 1169-1177, November.
    7. Elliott, Catherine S. & Fitzgerald, Keith & Hayward, Donald M. & Krasteva, Stela, 2009. "Some indications of limits to framing the policy preferences of the civically engaged: Interplay of social capital, race attitudes, and social justice frames," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 96-103, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:fosoec:v:36:y:2007:i:1:p:53-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RFSE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.