Feminism, Realism, and Universalism
AbstractFeminists have drawn attention to, and rightly criticized, the tendency of dominant groups unthinkingly to universalize their own values and practices. In so doing, however, many feminists have appeared inclined to criticize almost any practice of generalizing, a development that has proven problematic for feminist epistemological and emancipatory projects. Such considerations invite a questioning of how, if at all, the general and the particular are, or might legitimately be, combined in any context. The argument here is that addressing this sort of question can benefit from a more explicit attention to ontology than is to be found in much of the feminist literature. Illustrations of how ontology can make a difference are developed.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Feminist Economics.
Volume (Year): 5 (1999)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.tandfonline.com/RFEC20
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Shelley Phipps & Peter Burton, 1995. "Social/institutional variables and behavior within households: An empirical test using the Luxembourg income study," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 151-174.
- Julie A. Nelson, 1993. "Value-Free or Valueless? Notes on the Pursuit of Detachment in Economics," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 25(1), pages 121-145, Spring.
- Strassmann, Diana L, 1994. "Feminist Thought and Economics: Or, What Do the Visigoths Know?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 84(2), pages 153-58, May.
- Simel Esim, 1997. "Can Feminist Methodology Reduce Power Hierarchies in Research Settings?," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 137-139.
- Irene van Staveren, 1997. "Focus Groups: Contributing to a Gender-Aware Methodology," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 131-135.
- Jennifer Olmsted, 1997. "Telling Palestinian Women's Economic Stories," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 141-151.
- Gunseli Berik, 1997. "The Need for Crossing the Method Boundaries in Economics Research," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 121-125.
- Ulla Grapard, 1995. "Robinson Crusoe: The quintessential economic man?," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 33-52.
- Janet Seiz, 1993. "Feminism and the History of Economic Thought," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 25(1), pages 185-201, Spring.
- Joyce Jacobsen & Andrew Newman, 1997. "What Data Do Economists Use? The Case of Labor Economics and Industrial Relations," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 127-130.
- Weintraub, E Roy, 1989. " Methodology Doesn't Matter, but the History of Thought Might," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 91(2), pages 477-93.
- Nancy Folbre, 1993. "How Does She Know? Feminist Theories of Gender Bias in Economics," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 25(1), pages 167-184, Spring.
- M. V. Lee Badgett, 1995. "Gender, sexuality, and sexual orientation: All in the feminist family?," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 121-139.
- Garofalo, M.R. & Marra, M, 2007. "Work-Life Reconciliation Policies From Well-Being To Development: Rethinking EU Gender Mainstreaming," MPRA Paper 9598, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Siobhan Austen & Therese Jefferson, 2006. "Comparing responses to critical realism," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 257-282.
- Vinca Bigo, 2006. "Open and closed systems and the Cambridge School," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 64(4), pages 493-514.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.